Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t09BNidB021188 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 12:23:45 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Y9XTq-0001sf-Nk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:11:50 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Y9XTq-0001sW-27 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:11:50 +0000 Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-10.server.virginmedia.net ([80.0.253.74]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9XTo-0008CA-H1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:11:48 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.6] ([86.11.222.118]) by know-smtprelay-10-imp with bizsmtp id dnBm1p02o2Zsi3201nBnhE; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:11:47 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [86.11.222.118] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=dY0O3Bne c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=SuBfSidSudpnzoPf7Jvm+w==:117 a=SuBfSidSudpnzoPf7Jvm+w==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=lWrvVqSGw1hYFDuYU6MA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:11:40 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <54AFB76C.6741.54B7FD@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-reply-to: <8592571821BB4496B94ADC934CBC0555@AGB> References: <46D2E1AF22D14849AD1095081F7613AB@AGB>, <000c01d02b55$440817e0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL>, <8592571821BB4496B94ADC934CBC0555@AGB> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-description: Mail message body X-Scan-Signature: b77892ad90d0261eaf071f4f6cf31464 Subject: Re: LF: New version OPERA >> ''Opera Dynamic'' << Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1898 Graham, The example you give below does not prove your case. In fact it does the opposite. The last figure in the OPDS readout, "15.4dB", shows that the decode is at the very edge of deciding that it is true and must therefore be viewed with suspicion. OP does not have that kind of figure. There is a lot of information in both the OPDS and WSPR data that can flag up possible false decodes. The beauty of Opera is that it is simple, but that is creating a problem here. > I don't even have a 136 Tx and am regularly spotted on 136 > > 2015-01-01 19:01:38 G0NBD 2056km 137513.376Hz 3mHz -36.6dBOp 95% > 15.4dB The information below is even more worrying. Until now it seemed that every false decode was reported by only one station. Jay says he was not active but two stations concluded that what they saw was his transmission. > This looks convincing to me, two at the same time into UK/SV > > 00:34 136 WD2XNS de SV8CS Op32 Deep Search 4722 mi -42 dB in > Zakynthos Island with 1w + 00:34 136 WD2XNS de 2E0ILY Op32 Deep > Search 3245 mi -42 dB in Shropshire IO82qv with 1w + This is definitely still a work in progress. Mike, G3XDV ==========