Message-ID: <54A70D49.8050901@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 16:27:37 -0500
From: John Andrews <w1tag@charter.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <54A5D43B.9060505@gmx.de> <AD2BFDA675854D468533C30A39A2F8D5@White> <54A6F18A.3050109@gmail.com> <18172166B5DB43B1A01D01807C0F251C@White> <54A7081B.3060808@gmx.de> <3877C83C54F94DB1807F7AC81964E853@White>
In-Reply-To: <3877C83C54F94DB1807F7AC81964E853@White>
Subject: Re: LF: 137kHz actvity
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hartmut,

Explain to your neighbor that a bunch of guys from the United States 
will gladly come over and mow his lawn.

John, W1TAG

On 1/2/2015 4:18 PM, Markus Vester wrote:
> Hi Hartmut,
> well we enjoy it while it's good ;-)
> I can see two solutions: either build a resonant antenna to drain
> off all the energy from the charger. The neighbour will think it's
> broken and throw it away. Or explain the situation and offer to manually
> cut the grass for him ;~)
> All the best,
> Markus
>
> *From:* Hartmut Wolff <mailto:h-wolff@gmx.de>
> *Sent:* Friday, January 02, 2015 10:05 PM
> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org <mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> *Subject:* Re: LF: 137kHz actvity
>
> Markus,
>
> thanks for the kind words.
> But when my neighbour is switching on his Robotic Lawn Mower with
> wireless charging again this year in April, all the fun is over. It was
> running until the end of November 24/7 last year.
>
> 73
> Hartmut
>
> Am 2015-01-02 um 21:34 schrieb Markus Vester:
>  > Stefan,
>  >
>  > very nice! And it was a good night, like in the "old days".
>  >
>  > Stefan, you've got more: Your 4:55 capture also shows an
> almost-but-not-quite readable "XNS" from Jay on 781, just after 4 UT. At
> the same hour there's at least a partial "X" and "EB" on 778. It looks
> like John's DFCW "XES" on 778.6 / 778.8 was the hardest one to detect -
> I think I caught a only single dash on the higher frequency just before
> 2 UT.
>  >
>  > But I just have to admit we are all "Waisenknaben" (poor orphan
> boys), compared to Hartmut's amazing results.
>  >
>  > Thanks to all who contributed to this bounty of activity!
>  >
>  > 73, Markus (DF6NM)
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>