Return-Path: Received: from rly-mc01.mail.aol.com (rly-mc01.mail.aol.com [172.20.118.143]) by air-mc04.mail.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILINMC42-fb4720f553381; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:58:45 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mc01.mail.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMC11-fb4720f553381; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:58:13 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Il8oN-0007ca-P5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:56:11 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Il8oM-0007cR-NI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:56:10 +0100 Received: from imo-m25.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.6]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Il8oJ-0005aT-Hz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:56:10 +0100 Received: from MarkusVester@aol.com by imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id l.bc0.1bc2e3e4 (34952) for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:55:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Amilo3205 (acb2492d.ipt.aol.com [172.178.73.45]) by cia-da06.mx.aol.com (v119.12) with ESMTP id MAILCIADA061-88884720f4c85f; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:55:54 -0400 Message-ID: <54A3DB56002D4F2C9287622CB2490BB6@Amilo3205> From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <200710231851550500.02786762@smtp.wanadoo.fr> <000b01c8171a$bc076950$06cdfc3e@g3kev> In-Reply-To: <000b01c8171a$bc076950$06cdfc3e@g3kev> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:55:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: Loran Anthorn status? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C81751.CF24E2B0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C81751.CF24E2B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mal, LF, yesterday I reactivated my 100 kHz Loran monitor and set it up to look for t= he new signal from Anthorn, assuming it would simply replace Rugby on timesl= ot 6731-Y. However no trace was seen, neither at the old emission delay posi= tion (27.3 ms, plus receive path difference), nor anywhere else when searchi= ng between 6731-X and 6731-Z. Is the new transmitter operating continuously, or still spaoradically on a t= est schedule? Is it emitting proper Loran frames at the right repetition rat= e (ie. spectral lines at 7.4283 Hz multiples)? Can anyone perhaps confirm in= formation on the emission delay? Kind regards, Markus, DF6NM ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "hamilton mal" To: Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 5:20 PM Subject: LF: Re: Re: loran > John, > Loran is now audible clicking away since it moved to its new location, whe= n > located at Rugby it was just about visible but not audible with me. > My loop antenna is E/W and if its located West from me I suppose it will b= e > fairly strong, whereas at Rugby south from me it was in my loop null, more > or less. > I have not carried out any exact measurements, since it did not bother me=20= in > the past. >=20 > MalG3KEV =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C81751.CF24E2B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Mal, LF,
 
yesterday I reactivated my 100 kHz Lor= an=20 monitor and set it up to look for the new signal from Anthorn, assuming= it=20 would simply replace Rugby on timeslot 6731-Y. However no trace was see= n,=20 neither at the old emission delay position (27.3 ms, plus=20 receive path difference), nor anywhere else when searching between 6731= -X=20 and 6731-Z.
 
Is the new transmitter operating continuous= ly, or=20 still spaoradically on a test schedule? Is it emitting proper= =20 Loran frames at the right repetition rate (ie. spectral lines at 7.4283= Hz=20 multiples)? Can anyone perhaps confirm information on the emission= =20 delay?
 
Kind regards,
Markus, DF6NM
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "hamilton mal" <g3kev.ham@vir= gin.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 5:20=20 PM
Subject: LF: Re: Re: loran

> John,
> Loran is now audible clicking away si= nce it moved to=20 its new location, when
> located at Rugby it was just about visible bu= t=20 not audible with me.
> My loop antenna is E/W and if its located West=20= from=20 me I suppose it will be
> fairly strong, whereas at Rugby south from m= e it=20 was in my loop null, more
> or less.
> I have not carried out an= y=20 exact measurements, since it did not bother me in
> the past.
>=20
> MalG3KEV
 
 ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C81751.CF24E2B0--