Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1169; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id sA3DUpZ1008693 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 14:30:51 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1XlHdp-0005T7-Se for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:25:53 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1XlHdp-0005Sy-FA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:25:53 +0000 Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com ([209.85.215.54]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1XlHdn-0003nk-8U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:25:52 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id s18so4112883lam.13 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 05:25:49 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type; bh=VZzX8rj6RIX104+C/lVl0uUP/KvREVKtlEVaxqPVmNs=; b=j9MO+xxbUydOlcfzrqY0wrhLNs3yVBa5A3gF+mKRFWbwElAFBlxCOt+iZbWJDcMl5V JR8puyGhrT2Inmlp6saFnAZjWKZIhf31yER47+TxLJWqpgvvrac0X8tacp+JT82QkptQ eEDeD8dm8tCsPWFyEPcYrCZJ4/S9oAiTNxbpV2rldRnBfKwUwk4004X0YjNDhOL3iWpb fYhGKZDR1A6v7TSlF0AdTN/sHzDDOvEZ8cvnhiped3pmyjINqiMXYwuvQ/E1FaiC3u8p VrGzsuyG5iwNEX21fBKp19wQ4B5zebdxR5PFucRNVl5nDt+ZZ5U+DgUQdUsJvljeCHtH O0uA== X-Received: by 10.112.201.201 with SMTP id kc9mr52073963lbc.76.1415021149765; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 05:25:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w8sm676418lae.19.2014.11.03.05.25.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Nov 2014 05:25:48 -0800 (PST) From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5457825A.7080308@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:25:46 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Scan-Signature: 617a5faed955112e448650f4d003a84d Subject: LF: MF CW activity Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060804060706050804010301" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1022 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060804060706050804010301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi MF, Just regarding CW activity on MF, below you can find another good example that (CW) activity rises activity. So if there is no one on the band, just call CQ, preverably with *Q R O* so that many stations can hear you, even those with local QRM and compromise antennas. First they must hear you, _then_ they may start to improve their RX system and _just then_ they will hear the QRP stations! Even if no one answers, the calls are not "a waste of energy and time". At least for me it's nice to know there are a few people outside catchinhg the signal, maybe even unintended :-) In that case, the OM didn't even know that the 630m band is existing for radio amateurs! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Forwarded email with kind permission by the author: > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Betreff: 600m band > Datum: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 12:37:54 +0000 > Von: fagend123 . > > An: dk7fc@darc.de > > > > From Leighton GW-20048 / GW0LBI > > Hello Stefan, > Just a short email to tell you that I picked up your signals on > the 600m band yesterday evening. I heard you calling CQ a few > times with your locator JN49, then you started working another DK > station called Rudi. I didn't get the callsign of the other > station because of local QRM, but your signals were clear here at > times, best report 519 for you. > > I was tuning on my RX looking for the non-directional aircraft > beacons between 280KHz and 530KHz when I came across your CQ > calling on 473KHz. At first I thought there must be a fault with > my RX because I didn't know about the new 600m band, but now that > I do, I'll listen there some more! Very interesting! > > My SWL station is a Trio R-600 with end-fed wire antenna (see > GW0LBI on QRZ.com), and my location is Bargoed Wales, IO81jq if > that is any use to you. > > Anyway hope this helps Stefan, I'll listen for you again, and good > luck. > > Guten Tag, > > Leighton GW-20049 / GW0LBI --------------060804060706050804010301 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi MF,

Just regarding CW activity on MF, below you can find another good example that (CW) activity rises activity. So if there is no one on the band, just call CQ, preverably with Q R O so that many stations can hear you, even those with local QRM and compromise antennas. First they must hear you, then they may start to improve their RX system and just then they will hear the QRP stations! Even if no one answers, the calls are not "a waste of energy and time". At least for me it's nice to know there are a few people outside catchinhg the signal, maybe even unintended :-) In that case, the OM didn't even know that the 630m band is existing for radio amateurs!

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Forwarded email with kind permission by the author:

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: 600m band
Datum: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 12:37:54 +0000
Von: fagend123 . <gw0lbi@googlemail.com>
An: dk7fc@darc.de


From Leighton GW-20048 / GW0LBI

Hello Stefan,
Just a short email to tell you that I picked up your signals on the 600m band yesterday evening. I heard you calling CQ a few times with your locator JN49, then you started working another DK station called Rudi. I didn't get the callsign of the other station because of local QRM, but your signals were clear here at times, best report 519 for you.

I was tuning on my RX looking for the non-directional aircraft beacons between 280KHz and 530KHz when I came across your CQ calling on 473KHz. At first I thought there must be a fault with my RX because I didn't know about the new 600m band, but now that I do, I'll listen there some more! Very interesting!

My SWL station is a Trio R-600 with end-fed wire antenna (see GW0LBI on QRZ.com), and my location is Bargoed Wales, IO81jq if that is any use to you.

Anyway hope this helps Stefan, I'll listen for you again, and good luck.

Guten Tag,

Leighton GW-20049 / GW0LBI


--------------060804060706050804010301--