Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1356; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_50_60, HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s7FJRFQN001034 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 21:27:16 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1XIN6y-0006Wb-Gi for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 20:24:28 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1XIN6y-0006WS-7X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 20:24:28 +0100 Received: from out.ipsmtp3nec.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.202.75]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XIN6w-0000eD-BP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 20:24:27 +0100 X-SMTPAUTH: g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmECABxe7lNYaDUF/2dsb2JhbAANTINgg1OFW8U6h1MDAgGBKIR7AQEEI1URCQIYCRYIAwICCQMCAQIBDyUDAQ0TBgIBAYgqAx6SAJs9d49pDYUtF40fCoIpARaCY4FTBZVGhGiDZox0ihBrAYJOAQEB X-IPAS-Result: AmECABxe7lNYaDUF/2dsb2JhbAANTINgg1OFW8U6h1MDAgGBKIR7AQEEI1URCQIYCRYIAwICCQMCAQIBDyUDAQ0TBgIBAYgqAx6SAJs9d49pDYUtF40fCoIpARaCY4FTBZVGhGiDZox0ihBrAYJOAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,872,1400022000"; d="scan'208,217";a="212599609" Received: from 88-104-53-5.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([88.104.53.5]) by out.ipsmtp3nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 15 Aug 2014 20:24:25 +0100 Message-ID: <53EE5E74.4030405@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 20:24:36 +0100 From: Gary - G4WGT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Scan-Signature: 29f208b223fe7a2cb359508e38e2ea2d Subject: Re: LF: USB Sound Card? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080100000001090401030305" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 216 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080100000001090401030305 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Warren, Yes, I had an internal (on main board) & used it for a while for my grabber when 73kHz was first allocated to USA. It was good to about 94kHz. The SB0490 I suggested is only 96kHz :-(( *73, de Gary - G4WGT MF-LF-VLF Grabber : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/grabber2.html Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/index.html* . On 15/08/2014 20:09, Warren Ziegler wrote: > I guess I should have been more specific . > What I am seeking is are some sound cards more stable with respect to > sampling rate and calibration? Also, any advantage to 24bit A/D for > LF data modes? > I wonder if anyone has tried 192kHz sample rate for direct reception > of 73kHz? > > 73 & Tnx Warren > > > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Warren Ziegler > wrote: > > > I just acquired a Windows Vista tower computer - the price was > right it was free! > Seems that there is a problem with the internal sound card, but > everything else checks out FB. > I plan on using it with WSPR and other digital modes, am thinking > of an external USB sound card - will any old sound card do ? Or do > I need one with a calibrated sampling rate? I suspect that I will > need something really good for Spectrum Laboratory if I want to > sample at microHertz rates. > > 73 & Tnx Warren K2ORS > > > > > > > -- > 73 Warren K2ORS > WD2XGJ > WD2XSH/23 > WE2XEB/2 > WE2XGR/1 > --------------080100000001090401030305 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Warren,

Yes, I had an internal (on main board) & used it for a while for my grabber when 73kHz was first allocated to USA.
It was good to about 94kHz.

The SB0490 I suggested is only 96kHz :-((
73, de Gary - G4WGT
                            
MF-LF-VLF Grabber : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/grabber2.html
Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/index.html

.
On 15/08/2014 20:09, Warren Ziegler wrote:
I guess I should have been more specific .
What I am seeking is are some sound cards more stable with respect to sampling rate and calibration? Also, any advantage to 24bit A/D  for LF data modes?
 I wonder if anyone has tried 192kHz sample rate for direct reception of 73kHz?

73 & Tnx Warren




On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Warren Ziegler <wd2xgj@gmail.com> wrote:

I just acquired a Windows Vista tower computer - the price was right it was free!
Seems that there is a problem with the internal sound card, but everything else checks out FB.
I plan on using it with WSPR and other digital modes, am thinking of an external USB sound card - will any old sound card do ? Or do I need one with a calibrated sampling rate? I suspect that I will need something really good for Spectrum Laboratory if I want to sample at microHertz rates.

73 & Tnx Warren K2ORS


 



--
73 Warren K2ORS
                WD2XGJ
                WD2XSH/23
                WE2XEB/2
                WE2XGR/1

 

--------------080100000001090401030305--