Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9csp371042igb; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:03:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.37.180 with SMTP id z20mr13406471wij.58.1403733820224; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i7si29708938wiz.5.2014.06.25.15.03.39 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Wzv87-0007U0-6g for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:53:23 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Wzv86-0007To-Rc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:53:22 +0100 Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1Wzv84-0001Gn-Su for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:53:21 +0100 Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u56so2656038wes.36 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:53:20 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=ORZ6mmw3mQ/KgJrCfiVa/xMSZro6zxynKUokypyEVWM=; b=T6fykBNO0tgLHdpd8HpvkN8XuUfxIpmVARg5yD6aPTnNQe+lvgyhjlRn87TFfPilhB Lk+35J9/qLU76lhTsjxMYoq9UDAuZy+OsQCy7p8DP9iEk59lxjiTuVW32qU1oUfCDCuO D14usgIlh//8FsPeKGz38m0WxMqjVUEio+CPolQ1Sy1RwVxpz5gumRCV4zwgkLMMimmj D6E+Bpj72kWUaKmdBWeQD5+UCC12BmG6L5+cUpVlWM3FxRuqpKB0jTtmZffV0iYrBGZV mk4WPXq1YeN4ZQXNSgA4FOZhAXzTTqvHgd6Yeet4XLr6la7cUFp5USk/SZV0AJjOpd+a WqsA== X-Received: by 10.180.221.108 with SMTP id qd12mr8505060wic.83.1403733200032; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ft20sm16744023wic.14.2014.06.25.14.53.19 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:53:19 -0700 (PDT) From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <53AB44CD.1090200@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:53:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" References: <53A97738.2070501@gmail.com> <8D15DE5531A8822-27BC-8EBC@webmail-m293.sysops.aol.com> <1799375869.9754147.1403629934148.JavaMail.root@comcast.net> <751419392.10617770.1403714825805.JavaMail.root@comcast.net> <53AB3EB8.5060705@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53AB3EB8.5060705@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Mark (again) (sri for the 10000000s of emails from me tonite :-) ), Maybe interesting to know, i've made 40 km distance on 8.97 kHz in normal CW. Maybe 100km could have been possible if there were CW listeners to that time in that distance and in a quiet location... .wav file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/DK7FCinCWon8970Hzthe33kmband.WAV (23 MB) But that was with a 300m vertical and 900 W RF power (350W average power but a "booster" cap of 10x6000 uF / 350V for the PA :-) ) :-) . [...] Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.82.177 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (73dk7fc[at]googlemail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 6bb858db23df2b82c4f5a8cb512b45b1 Subject: Re: LF: VLF in Canada - earth loop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060909090905000801050600" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060909090905000801050600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Mark (again) (sri for the 10000000s of emails from me tonite :-) ), Maybe interesting to know, i've made 40 km distance on 8.97 kHz in normal CW. Maybe 100km could have been possible if there were CW listeners to that time in that distance and in a quiet location... .wav file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/DK7FCinCWon8970Hzthe33kmband.WAV (23 MB) But that was with a 300m vertical and 900 W RF power (350W average power but a "booster" cap of 10x6000 uF / 350V for the PA :-) ) :-) . 73, Stefan Am 25.06.2014 23:27, schrieb DK7FC: > Hello Mark, > > 200W in such a loop and 8.97 or 8.27 kHz, CW, my guess is that the > distance is less than 2 km. But it depends on the type of the RX > antenna (E or H field). > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 25.06.2014 18:47, schrieb mbdittmar@comcast.net: >> Hi - >> >> I've been following the discussion on 9 khz transmit antennas with >> some interest, as a friend of mine, Tom, KD0VBR, has done some >> preliminary experimentation in this area ( using large loading coils >> w/ vertical ). Tom asked me to post a query regarding some antenna >> ideas he has, and it would be great to hear the group's thoughts on >> them and whether they might work or not. 73, Mark AB0CW >> >> Below are his questions: >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Pouliot, Tom" >> *To: *"Dittmar, Mark" >> *Sent: *Wednesday, June 25, 2014 8:51:48 AM >> *Subject: *RE: LF: VLF in Canada - earth loop >> >> Hi Mark, >> That would be great if you could post some questions about >> transmitting loops for VLF. >> Thinking about a square loop 200' per side 10' off the ground #8 >> wire with 200 watts into the antenna. How far away could one expect >> to be able to detect a CW signal ? ( not QRSS) >> Another possibility would be a triangular loop 200' per side with a >> 50' high apex. >> >> Tom >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------060909090905000801050600 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Mark (again) (sri for the 10000000s of emails from me tonite :-) ),

Maybe interesting to know, i've made 40 km distance on 8.97 kHz in normal CW. Maybe 100km could have been possible if there were CW listeners to that time in that distance and in a quiet location...
.wav file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/DK7FCinCWon8970Hzthe33kmband.WAV (23 MB)
But that was with a 300m vertical and 900 W RF power (350W average power but a "booster" cap of 10x6000 uF / 350V for the PA :-) ) :-) .

73, Stefan

Am 25.06.2014 23:27, schrieb DK7FC:
Hello Mark,

200W in such a loop and 8.97 or 8.27 kHz, CW, my guess is that the distance is less than 2 km. But it depends on the type of the RX antenna (E or H field).

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 25.06.2014 18:47, schrieb mbdittmar@comcast.net:
Hi -

I've been following the discussion on 9 khz transmit antennas with some interest, as a friend of mine, Tom, KD0VBR, has done some preliminary experimentation in this area ( using large loading coils w/ vertical ).  Tom asked me to post a query regarding some antenna ideas he has, and it would be great to hear the group's thoughts on them and whether they might work or not.  73, Mark AB0CW

Below are his questions:


From: "Pouliot, Tom" <tomandmarti@hotmail.com>
To: "Dittmar, Mark" <mbdittmar@comcast.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 8:51:48 AM
Subject: RE: LF: VLF in Canada - earth loop

Hi Mark,
That would be great if you could post some questions about transmitting loops for VLF.
Thinking about a square loop 200' per side 10' off the ground  #8 wire with 200 watts into the antenna. How far away could one expect to be able to detect a CW signal ? ( not QRSS)
Another possibility would be a triangular loop 200' per side with a 50' high apex.

Tom


--------------060909090905000801050600--