Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9csp220141igb; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:42:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.19.233 with SMTP id i9mr34907150wie.38.1403617335032; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fx16si495374wjc.31.2014.06.24.06.42.13 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WzQUz-00029t-R7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:10:57 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WzQUz-00029j-Hm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:10:57 +0100 Received: from vms173013pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WzQUx-0002Qs-LT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:10:56 +0100 MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([unknown] [72.93.10.160]) by vms173013.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0N7O009J5CLPBWC0@vms173013.mailsrvcs.net> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:10:38 -0500 (CDT) Message-id: <53A978CC.8010105@verizon.net> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:10:36 -0400 From: "stan, W1LE" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <53A8AE53.3060504@gmail.com> <8D15DB1FF8A27AE-2018-717F@webmail-d249.sysops.aol.com> In-reply-to: <8D15DB1FF8A27AE-2018-717F@webmail-d249.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Markus, Interesting post about your coil. If you cut the bottoms out from the buckets, would you have better convective air flow for cooling the coils ? Like a chimney effect. I am starting to think about 9KHz operations. An interesting challenge. [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [206.46.173.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: bplaced.net] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 21e2055b299bd63ed331c37c8a3e15ca Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_WgPoFlT7yDR5ULKCIZu2Pw)" Subject: Re: LF: VLF in Canada X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_WgPoFlT7yDR5ULKCIZu2Pw) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hello Markus, Interesting post about your coil. If you cut the bottoms out from the buckets, would you have better convective air flow for cooling the coils ? Like a chimney effect. I am starting to think about 9KHz operations. An interesting challenge. I could not get to the arced coil .JPG. Do you have a better web address ? Stan, W1LE Cape Cod FN41sr On 24-Jun-14 6:55 AM, Markus Vester wrote: > Joe, good to read this! > Regarding the loading coil, I would agree with Stefan that a large > multiturn air coil is the best option. A laminated iron core would > suffer from excessive eddy current losses, and the effect of ferrites > is limited by saturation and hysteresis losses. > My 1.3 henry coil consumed 2.3 km of 0.4 mm enameled wire, using 7 > buckets with 480 turns on each: > df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/VLF_110304-06/coil_legospacers.jpg. > The advantage is that due to magnetic coupling between layers, you > will need less wire for a given inductance. And the inductance is > adjustable across a wide range, using spacers. Disadvantages are the > high electric field between layers limiting voltage capability, and > less effective heat removal from the inner buckets. Stuffing the > buckets too tightly into one another is surely not a good idea: > df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/pictures/arced_coil_140601.jpg > --Boundary_(ID_WgPoFlT7yDR5ULKCIZu2Pw) Content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
Hello Markus,

Interesting post about your coil.
If you cut the bottoms out from the buckets,
would you have better convective air flow for cooling the coils ?
Like a chimney effect.

I am starting to think about 9KHz operations. An interesting challenge.

I could not get to the arced coil .JPG. Do you have a better web address ?

Stan, W1LE    Cape Cod   FN41sr



On 24-Jun-14 6:55 AM, Markus Vester wrote:
Joe, good to read this!
 
Regarding the loading coil, I would agree with Stefan that a large multiturn air coil is the best option. A laminated iron core would suffer from excessive eddy current losses, and the effect of ferrites is limited by saturation and hysteresis losses.
 
My 1.3 henry coil consumed 2.3 km of 0.4 mm enameled wire, using 7 buckets with 480 turns on each:
df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/VLF_110304-06/coil_legospacers.jpg.
The advantage is that due to magnetic coupling between layers, you will need less wire for a given inductance. And the inductance is adjustable across a wide range, using spacers. Disadvantages are the high electric field between layers limiting voltage capability, and less effective heat removal from the inner buckets. Stuffing the buckets too tightly into one another is surely not a good idea:
df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/pictures/arced_coil_140601.jpg
 


--Boundary_(ID_WgPoFlT7yDR5ULKCIZu2Pw)--