Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9csp220486igb; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:45:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.195.11.132 with SMTP id ei4mr1353737wjd.95.1403617553124; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dt5si1199272wib.38.2014.06.24.06.45.42 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WzQOH-0001lB-02 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:04:01 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WzQOG-0001l2-Iw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:04:00 +0100 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1WzQOE-0002MW-9Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:03:59 +0100 Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id y10so322196wgg.17 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:03:57 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=QgYlcJE2N0i6DIRoBrm4FrNLr+39gPdp+vdwa7PkJjQ=; b=A6SiT4ZorvfqTq5i8SyD0BFlgtEbe01RpV1WJdlvHwY8IMf+lCkiwijEAS4cUhFlvM GSTe8rmh8MzJMXEBdu30RVlNh1VBuW5WR6tz4sJfg3HrQd/FUsLRZB/eTCnnPaLzslr6 ldJuXtoDoffpMcGuso332p5XW51CeagTwR5MUB3LdCDY6PoQQ/j0ao/4Eg4tFf0DbRBU 5Gq4l+W8bjj5xfe5Q4W6F+BVE1wmpjHi9cyOpocgXiY2oSP6ylzANxJb39ViNZzSChIc dkX90NeOu5tl3Bc5UF6VHwnGvAYaxQV1TcPDNJOMnUakGZ86wBHW/NrxOCUAKWiIonve Epbw== X-Received: by 10.194.59.49 with SMTP id w17mr926689wjq.135.1403615036915; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:03:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bp2sm1688161wib.9.2014.06.24.06.03.55 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:03:56 -0700 (PDT) From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <53A97738.2070501@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:03:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <53A8AE53.3060504@gmail.com> <8D15DB1FF8A27AE-2018-717F@webmail-d249.sysops.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <8D15DB1FF8A27AE-2018-717F@webmail-d249.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Oh yes, Joe, if you have plenty of forest where you can play VLF games, i would also play with a dipole antenna. That's what i said to Laurence a few months ago. Just install a dipole with say 10 km length, adding 100m each day and see how the performance increases. This will be an interesting project :-) Maybe you remember my 700m long earth antenna which allowed me to be copied in 45 km distance in 4.5 mHz FFT BW, back in 2011 :-) Someone removed the antenna completely but if you have more space, just give it a try. I think that 8m above ground should be fine for any tests :-) Nice to think about it :-) [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.82.46 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: bplaced.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (73dk7fc[at]googlemail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 3f12a6171cff302119f724e64afab799 Subject: Re: LF: VLF in Canada Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090500000206050105000604" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090500000206050105000604 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Oh yes, Joe, if you have plenty of forest where you can play VLF games, i would also play with a dipole antenna. That's what i said to Laurence a few months ago. Just install a dipole with say 10 km length, adding 100m each day and see how the performance increases. This will be an interesting project :-) Maybe you remember my 700m long earth antenna which allowed me to be copied in 45 km distance in 4.5 mHz FFT BW, back in 2011 :-) Someone removed the antenna completely but if you have more space, just give it a try. I think that 8m above ground should be fine for any tests :-) Nice to think about it :-) 73, GL, Stefan Am 24.06.2014 12:55, schrieb Markus Vester: > Joe, good to read this! > Regarding the loading coil, I would agree with Stefan that a large > multiturn air coil is the best option. A laminated iron core would > suffer from excessive eddy current losses, and the effect of ferrites > is limited by saturation and hysteresis losses. > My 1.3 henry coil consumed 2.3 km of 0.4 mm enameled wire, using 7 > buckets with 480 turns on each: > df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/VLF_110304-06/coil_legospacers.jpg. > The advantage is that due to magnetic coupling between layers, you > will need less wire for a given inductance. And the inductance is > adjustable across a wide range, using spacers. Disadvantages are the > high electric field between layers limiting voltage capability, and > less effective heat removal from the inner buckets. Stuffing the > buckets too tightly into one another is surely not a good idea: > df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/pictures/arced_coil_140601.jpg > An nonresonant earth antenna across high resistivity rock could also > radiate moderately well, avoiding coil making and high voltage issues > altogether. But to compete with your vertical in terms of radiation > resistance, it would need to be really long, on the order of a couple > of miles. It will have magnetic loop directional pattern which may be > a disadvantage. > For a transatlantic detection eg. by Paul Nicholson, a Rubidium or GPS > locked signal source would be very beneficial. Using SpecLab with 1pps > phase lock to eliminate soundcard output glitches has worked well for > DJ8WX, PA1SDB, and myself. > Best of luck, > Markus (DF6NM) > > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Di, 24 Jun 2014 12:48 am > Betreff: Re: LF: VLF in Canada > > > Hi Joe, > > > > Fine to hear that you're give it a try. Please, don't ask Industry > > Canada if the 10mW is RF power of ERP! > > > > To get out a real signal on VLF, there is no alternative to a real large > > coil without ferrites! Think about the high voltages... But 100m of > > antenna wire is a good start. I remember 550 mH for my 100m kite > > antenna. For me it was 2000m of 0.4mm diameter wire :-) Nice work is > > that. Takes long but is a funny game :-) > > > > 73, GL, Stefan > > > > Am 23.06.2014 21:33, schriebjcraig@mun.ca : > > Dear Group, > > I tried again to get an LOA for VLF. This time, the response from > > Industry Canada was favourable: 10 mW 8.0-8.3 kHz. Yesterday, after a > > few slight rf burns, and thanks to PA0RDT's miniwhip design and > > DL4YHF's Spectrum Lab and advice, VLF sigs on 8.277 kHz were heard at > > 200m from the 100m wire aerial. This was a reception outside my back > > yard! 10 watts from an 1970's keyboard amp (volume control set on 3) > > were stepped up with an xfmr to a lossy 500 ohm tuning coil peaked > > with a ferrite rod for maximum squeal at L=0.35 H. > > Is it possible for someone who is not especially enthralled by winding > > a mile of 0.7mm wire to use an iron core to make a VLF tuning coil? > > 73 > > Joe VO1NA > > > > > > --------------090500000206050105000604 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Oh yes, Joe, if you have plenty of forest where you can play VLF games, i would also play with a dipole antenna. That's what i said to Laurence a few months ago. Just install a dipole with say 10 km length, adding 100m each day and see how the performance increases. This will be an interesting project :-)
Maybe you remember my 700m long earth antenna which allowed me to be copied in 45 km distance in 4.5 mHz FFT BW, back in 2011 :-) Someone removed the antenna completely but if you have more space, just give it a try. I think that 8m above ground should be fine for any tests :-)
Nice to think about it :-)

73, GL, Stefan

Am 24.06.2014 12:55, schrieb Markus Vester:
Joe, good to read this!
 
Regarding the loading coil, I would agree with Stefan that a large multiturn air coil is the best option. A laminated iron core would suffer from excessive eddy current losses, and the effect of ferrites is limited by saturation and hysteresis losses.
 
My 1.3 henry coil consumed 2.3 km of 0.4 mm enameled wire, using 7 buckets with 480 turns on each:
df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/VLF_110304-06/coil_legospacers.jpg.
The advantage is that due to magnetic coupling between layers, you will need less wire for a given inductance. And the inductance is adjustable across a wide range, using spacers. Disadvantages are the high electric field between layers limiting voltage capability, and less effective heat removal from the inner buckets. Stuffing the buckets too tightly into one another is surely not a good idea:
df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/pictures/arced_coil_140601.jpg
 
An nonresonant earth antenna across high resistivity rock could also radiate moderately well, avoiding coil making and high voltage issues altogether. But to compete with your vertical in terms of radiation resistance, it would need to be really long, on the order of a couple of miles. It will have magnetic loop directional pattern which may be a disadvantage.
 
For a transatlantic detection eg. by Paul Nicholson, a Rubidium or GPS locked signal source would be very beneficial. Using SpecLab with 1pps phase lock to eliminate soundcard output glitches has worked well for DJ8WX, PA1SDB, and myself.
 
Best of luck,
Markus (DF6NM)


-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Di, 24 Jun 2014 12:48 am
Betreff: Re: LF: VLF in Canada


Hi Joe, 

 

Fine to hear that you're give it a try. Please, don't ask Industry  

Canada if the 10mW is RF power of ERP! 

 

To get out a real signal on VLF, there is no alternative to a real large  

coil without ferrites! Think about the high voltages... But 100m of  

antenna wire is a good start. I remember 550 mH for my 100m kite  

antenna. For me it was 2000m of 0.4mm diameter wire :-) Nice work is  

that. Takes long but is a funny game :-) 

 

73, GL, Stefan 

 

Am 23.06.2014 21:33, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: 

Dear Group, 

I tried again to get an LOA  for VLF.  This time, the response from  

Industry Canada was favourable: 10 mW 8.0-8.3 kHz.  Yesterday, after a  

few slight rf burns, and  thanks to PA0RDT's miniwhip design and  

DL4YHF's Spectrum Lab and advice, VLF sigs on 8.277 kHz were heard at  

200m from the 100m wire aerial. This was a reception outside my back  

yard!  10 watts from an 1970's keyboard amp (volume control set on 3)  

were stepped up with an xfmr to a lossy 500 ohm tuning coil peaked  

with a ferrite rod for maximum squeal at L=0.35 H. 

Is it possible for someone who is not especially enthralled by winding 

a mile of 0.7mm wire to use an iron core to make a VLF tuning coil? 

73 

Joe VO1NA 





  
--------------090500000206050105000604--