Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9csp166593igb; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 14:10:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.181.12.104 with SMTP id ep8mr26392108wid.0.1401743430316; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 14:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id da8si24083021wib.3.2014.06.02.14.10.27 for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 14:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WrYhi-0006P7-18 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 21:19:34 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WrYhe-0006Oy-HW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 21:19:30 +0100 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([195.4.92.92]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WrYhc-0008KK-Mn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 21:19:29 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.82 #1) id 1WrYhZ-00033v-QO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:19:25 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1]:50230 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.82 #1) id 1WrYhZ-0002qw-L7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:19:25 +0200 Received: from mx3.freenet.de ([195.4.92.13]:43833) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.82 #1) id 1WrYeN-0000k9-Vw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:16:07 +0200 Received: from blfd-4d0881d8.pool.mediaways.net ([77.8.129.216]:3486 helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mx3.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.82 #1) id 1WrYeN-00016G-KK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:16:07 +0200 Message-ID: <538CDB90.5030702@freenet.de> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:16:16 +0200 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <538CD411.9000608@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <538CD411.9000608@abelian.org> X-Originated-At: 77.8.129.216!3486 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Paul, Dex, and all, Congratulations to all involved - especially considering the noise level on LF at this time of year. Guess a lot of noise blanking was involved - do you have an estimation about how many percent of the transmission time were actually 'blanked' due to sferics ? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 896f9ee4f10c5db37812c155e804756d Subject: Re: VLF: W4DEX trans-Atlantic at 8971 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Paul, Dex, and all, Congratulations to all involved - especially considering the noise level on LF at this time of year. Guess a lot of noise blanking was involved - do you have an estimation about how many percent of the transmission time were actually 'blanked' due to sferics ? Cheers, Wolf . Am 02.06.2014 21:44, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > At 2014-06-01 10:00 UT W4DEX began a long transmission of GPS > locked carrier at 8971.000 Hz from 35.273N,80.371W. > > Between 2014-06-02 00:00 and 06:00 a carrier was measured > at that frequency here in Todmorden 53.703N,2.072W with flux > density around 0.05fT. It was not very significant so I > combined the H-field and E-field receiver outputs (correcting > for their known phase and amplitude response) to produce a > uni-directional antenna response. This brought the signal up to > a significant level. > > The signal bearing was roughly west. W4DEX is bearing 285 deg > from here. The S/N is max on a bearing of 315 degrees which > puts the prevailing south-westerly background nearer to the > side of the antenna response. > > This gave the signal a respectable 12.5dB S/N in 46uHz bandwidth. > > http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/w4dex_140602a.gif > > This was the strongest peak in a span of over 6500 Fourier > bins so is quite significant. > > The carrier was also visible during the daylight path in 23uHz > bandwidth with average strength of around 0.02fT and with > similar S/N thanks to the lower day time noise and reduced > bandwidth. > > At 2014-06-02 12:00 Dex altered the TX frequency for a blind > confirmation test. Six hours later the carrier (in 46uHz) > had vanished and a new signal appeared at 8971.100 Hz with > the same strength. > > An email response from Dex confirms 8971.1 as the new frequency. > > Range W4DEX to Todmorden UK is 6194 km. > > Ratio of day/night flux density agrees well with LWPC > predictions for this path. LWPC predicts strongest night > signal between 00:30 and 04:30 and a sliding spectrum window > agrees with this. > > LWPC requires ERP of 150uW to reproduce the observed flux > density. This is in the center of the ERP range estimated > from W4DEX antenna dimensions and measured antenna current. > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- > > >