Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.208.67 with SMTP id mc3csp110735igc; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:11:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.73.140 with SMTP id l12mr14840516wiv.45.1399936308957; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q10si4931297wjf.70.2014.05.12.16.11.48 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WjyvT-0006EY-2a for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 23:42:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WjyvS-0006EP-MR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 23:42:26 +0100 Received: from smtp2.virginbroadband.com.au ([123.200.191.52] helo=smtp.virginbroadband.com.au) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WjyvQ-0000uz-9p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 23:42:25 +0100 Received: from [123.200.236.228] (unknown [123.200.236.228]) by smtp.virginbroadband.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCA9900AA8; Tue, 13 May 2014 08:42:13 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <53714E41.1090701@virginbroadband.com.au> Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 08:42:09 +1000 From: edgar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" CC: "600m@yahoogroups.com" <600m@yahoogroups.com> X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 123.200.191.52 (smtp2.virginbroadband.com.au) used invalid HELO/EHLO smtp.virginbroadband.com.au - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, It is interesting to compare the difference between the HGA22 and DCF39 signals at a distance greater than 16000 km. The difference in signal level at 21:00 UTC on the 12-5-2014 is ~ 13 dB. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [123.200.191.52 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1f795a2ee1ecd56682b47ad11969b3d3 Subject: LF: HGA22 vrs DCF39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi, It is interesting to compare the difference between the HGA22 and DCF39 signals at a distance greater than 16000 km. The difference in signal level at 21:00 UTC on the 12-5-2014 is ~ 13 dB. The difference in path length is ~ 562 km or about 3%. Refer to https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101251787/testIDC.html Regards, Edgar Moonah, Tasmania.