Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp106901igc; Wed, 7 May 2014 06:57:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.57.38 with SMTP id f6mr2673845wjq.59.1399471019514; Wed, 07 May 2014 06:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hr9si3769551wib.105.2014.05.07.06.56.59 for ; Wed, 07 May 2014 06:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Wi1r9-0002yX-AO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 14:25:55 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Wi1r8-0002yO-Ld for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 14:25:54 +0100 Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1Wi1r6-0004Cp-1O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 14:25:53 +0100 Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b57so756550eek.27 for ; Wed, 07 May 2014 06:25:51 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=910yYbUpvTb1AceNYU8uNyMrxlUTfzknkbUDBGJEkG0=; b=p5xDc/Liyb4TAzxIxMmI3Onv3GrvG6ImjI+iJQu1+n9PIr34U800vfC0y6d4Zld/o7 b2VLzYq8TTy3LC9HTeJKWC8NH1At+VJXdaYwYS4X+fNylnPaz3L9c+d4qWXzYDf4CpVV C7HmnvyBsLMg0i5podqA5Mkj+yUOtMypPnyfBd9U9MnD3YeBTdEpISd0oSNeaPHd12hk 8tcrX6b0AEoqXi4yv9/2g28ngRt7cf4hrotOkrygCK8E/HuN/43X30cMsJObRjrg0IYp hIofyMKQbDn7h8PbbwvoSNOPIWSHD6LJ5y/ufMVPGTcYQlUNX/oWtI4+R/DczQoYs0wx pXmA== X-Received: by 10.14.214.198 with SMTP id c46mr46318960eep.29.1399469151292; Wed, 07 May 2014 06:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm4190858eep.40.2014.05.07.06.25.49 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 07 May 2014 06:25:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <536A345D.8090105@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 15:25:49 +0200 From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <53694602.30205@xs4all.nl> <536A08AA.8040902@gmail.com> <536A103F.6070801@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <536A103F.6070801@xs4all.nl> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Tnx Albert. Yes, the signals were fine, congrats. I listened to the file aftrr my first mail. Yes, in terms of erp we're all QRP stns. I just wanted to confirm for me that QRO power was used here, since it appears that some are actually thinking it can be done with low TX power... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.83.54 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (73dk7fc[at]googlemail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: a44b221381f32eba3e5127fadf77bc3d Subject: Re: CW & SSB T/A !(was Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090307020505070605020005" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090307020505070605020005 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Tnx Albert. Yes, the signals were fine, congrats. I listened to the file aftrr my first mail. Yes, in terms of erp we're all QRP stns. I just wanted to confirm for me that QRO power was used here, since it appears that some are actually thinking it can be done with low TX power... 73 from Berlin, Stefan Am 07.05.2014 12:51, schrieb Albert: > Stefan, > > If you take a better look at Bob's QSL card (click to enlarge) you see > 2000W tx power. I used abt 400W to get the 5 W erp radiated by the > antenna. If you listen to the signal of Bob you will realize that only > RRRRR etc was not necessary. > You are right abt using QRP on these bands, a QRO tx is very useful > to get out of the garden. If you consider the erp. we are actually > working QRP on these low bands. > > 73, Albert > > > > > > DK7FC schreef op 7-5-2014 12:19: >> Hi, >> >> Aaaaaah so that was QRO, not QRP, right? Or what was the TX power, >> rather 5W or rather 500W? >> And what about Bob, 5W or 500W? >> Just to make things clear regarding "QRO is not necessary". >> Was it a longer QSO with some content or just "RRRRR 73 73 73 >> didididadidaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" :-) >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >> >> Am 06.05.2014 22:28, schrieb Albert: >>> All fyi, >>> >>> I had a CW QSO on 502 kHz with Bob WE2XGR/6 on Feb 9 2010, 04:00 >>> UTC at that time the DX record on CW. On my website (in plane Dutch) >>> a copy of the QSL card and an audio file of the first part of the >>> QSO including a restart of my keyer. My output during the QSO was >>> abt, 5 W erp. >>> >>> http://www.pa0a.com/500-khz/ >>> >>> (see: EERSTE QSO NEDERLAND etc.) for the audio file click left on >>> QSO WE2XGR-6 v3 >>> >>> 73, Albert PA0A >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Warren Ziegler schreef op 6-5-2014 16:57: >>>> Andy, >>>> >>>> Some years ago Bob W2ZM using the experimental call WE2XGR/6 >>>> worked Finbar EI0CF on CW and also ssb (Bob ran ssb, Finbar ran CW). >>>> Somewhere I have a .wav file from Finbar with his reception of >>>> Bob's ssb signal. >>>> I know that there have been other T/A contacts but I don't recall >>>> all the details. >>>> >>>> 73 Warren K2ORS >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > --------------090307020505070605020005 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Tnx Albert.
Yes, the signals were fine, congrats. I listened to the file aftrr my first mail.
Yes, in terms of erp we're all QRP stns. I just wanted to confirm for me that QRO power was used here, since it appears that some are actually thinking it can be done with low TX power...

73 from Berlin, Stefan



Am 07.05.2014 12:51, schrieb Albert:
Stefan,

If you take a better look at Bob's QSL card (click to enlarge) you see 2000W tx power. I used abt 400W to get the 5 W erp radiated by the antenna. If you listen to the signal of Bob you will realize that only RRRRR etc was not necessary.
You are right abt using QRP on these bands,  a QRO tx is very useful to get out of the garden. If you consider the erp. we are actually working QRP on these low bands.

73, Albert

     



DK7FC schreef op 7-5-2014 12:19:
Hi,

Aaaaaah so that was QRO, not QRP, right? Or what was the TX power, rather 5W or rather 500W?
And what about Bob, 5W or 500W?
Just to make things clear regarding "QRO is not necessary".
Was it a longer QSO with some content or just "RRRRR 73 73 73 didididadidaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" :-)

73, Stefan



Am 06.05.2014 22:28, schrieb Albert:
All fyi,

I had a CW QSO on 502 kHz with Bob WE2XGR/6 on Feb 9 2010,  04:00 UTC at that time the DX record on CW. On my website (in plane Dutch) a copy of the QSL card and an audio file of the first part of the QSO including a restart of my keyer. My output during the QSO was abt, 5 W erp.

 http://www.pa0a.com/500-khz/

(see: EERSTE QSO NEDERLAND etc.)  for the audio file click left on QSO WE2XGR-6 v3

73, Albert PA0A





Warren Ziegler schreef op 6-5-2014 16:57:
Andy,

   Some years ago Bob W2ZM using the experimental call WE2XGR/6 worked Finbar EI0CF on CW and also ssb (Bob ran ssb, Finbar ran CW).  
    Somewhere I have a .wav file from Finbar with his reception of Bob's ssb signal.
I know that there have been other T/A contacts but I don't recall all the details.

73 Warren K2ORS







--------------090307020505070605020005--