Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp169330igc; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:42:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.94.102 with SMTP id db6mr3682442wib.12.1397518966160; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i17si5673477wjq.235.2014.04.14.16.42.45 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WZpla-0006h1-Ku for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:54:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WZpla-0006gs-36 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:54:18 +0100 Received: from mail-ee0-f49.google.com ([74.125.83.49]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1WZplY-0006t3-Fh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:54:16 +0100 Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id c41so7027104eek.8 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:54:15 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kJEMpgDbhp1mW1cVhg81BNeuLmUka0EfjqC2upIpLU0=; b=poEe7B87STaZLZOoqWhrArVM8B58WUUQXDZng+oMPBmL/smpuiOc28Y2+VZXz6G7ZK PLGQP7Ver6eojH+MvYieaQgmoCL57CedDLEzEOR6/8lQgO/Itp+GG3oWW5tXEzo0n2E+ M7CMVTHcOmIYncbn7fZnKrAyMkZ1tHREwGOpG73SjQn115HVFSC55fcb9DKCDxMK0a68 sX21gcyqlotnXRvFf+Pqhc8tWaj0Fg9dMnzuU0o7qf6fNLGHUIwTyssSGdWjqCwhDYRR jaxbbl0MrcGBgcZOe6cyC/CWgJd6awGhhcr9ikibtHu3IulaDaeU+ZanMBHTF48h49NE sDTA== X-Received: by 10.15.60.199 with SMTP id g47mr55377348eex.37.1397516055085; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:54:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m42sm44449653eex.21.2014.04.14.15.54.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <534C6715.9030204@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:54:13 +0200 From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <53493E64.5090708@gmail.com> <53499588.3000002@gmail.com> <4A845D55AC7B43CAAF854BD5F4FE616B@White> <53499AD4.3080405@gmail.com> <776DDB1AA79E4AAD876EB1C13CF23D5E@White> <534B3D08.1060204@charter.net> <534BCA16.7070802@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <534BCA16.7070802@charter.net> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi John, Joe, Jay, Joe, John, Dex, Markus, LF :-) Again thanks for your very nice screenshots or attempt to find tracks of our signals!! If F6HCC is improving his system (again), will you transmit from the other side of the pond again too? He is in an excellent location for a TA monitoring station here in EU... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.83.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (73dk7fc[at]googlemail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: c1f72e5acb1277e013f90c915ad7ad68 Subject: Re: LF: 136 kHz TA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi John, Joe, Jay, Joe, John, Dex, Markus, LF :-) Again thanks for your very nice screenshots or attempt to find tracks of our signals!! If F6HCC is improving his system (again), will you transmit from the other side of the pond again too? He is in an excellent location for a TA monitoring station here in EU... BTW i can see transmissions of UT7GH who has been focused on WSPR and OP32 so far. Seems we're rising some activity! :-) Ah and i remember email exchanges with EA5DOM, the man with the 90m high inv-L (planned). He is focused on other bands UHF and so on. I just got the idea to bring him here to the reflector. This could result in changes to the priorised bands :-) Would be very nice to have a new TX station with strong signals on LF...We'll see :-) I'm on air again, like the days before. But i thought about trying to receive VO1NA on MF. However there is strong QRN today on MF. I'll keep the bands watching. 73, Stefan Am 14.04.2014 13:44, schrieb John Andrews: > Copy of Stefan was best last night in the 0100Z - 0200Z, and 0330Z to > 0430Z. A little of Markus' signal showed up in that later period. > Screenshot from 0230Z to 0510Z is attached. > > John, W1TAG > FN42ch