Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp80513igc; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:49:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.204.173.75 with SMTP id o11mr1903355bkz.35.1397249383647; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:49:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id xy8si3264063bkb.163.2014.04.11.13.49.43 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:49:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WYiLg-0008I5-LK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 21:46:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WYiLf-0008Hw-TQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 21:46:55 +0100 Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1WYiLd-0003Xh-VT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 21:46:54 +0100 Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id d49so4492091eek.41 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:46:52 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=bj6+A2NLbprV7kCigUXY+xi67sgTzc2qmW0lLLiWZuo=; b=cQZS0z0+Jrjc4zWWWlIjKuadhgb+4ov/GSo2DtNNRdgYnI+81YOymMc7Lxpg8H67IS fB1400VHv8QQQEK9Hat8qlD+vNOww+kYAdJIQiWkRYxocEnRh+lADOnU/qZUdVQX9q0K LhflsfPbaMPUoglbgN4/+11RYkY8CIt0G8w+oNAE1m2oHYH9yTBkrqz+gAx+pJRIiQO8 Kl9WDY2UjkpIidWthfLfnE74J0HXNinJ+pS/9N4czyFzrwPU5VapOrN2C6EcT+1QZZK9 JGx4uwusXUJy/nDAYOhMuSzsob0nP9xugZWSoahMmxdGA+Bzppna0B5MtCLxsL1Y2sml CPvA== X-Received: by 10.14.184.66 with SMTP id r42mr5185125eem.84.1397249212617; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q41sm20243555eez.7.2014.04.11.13.46.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <534854BA.9040402@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:46:50 +0200 From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000501cf5510$dc6c5a80$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <5347E746.1070609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1397234624.757364861@f56.i.mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <1397234624.757364861@f56.i.mail.ru> X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Alex, It could be better to go to 136.174 kHz because my signal rises the background noise when it reaches 30 dB S/N and more, as you can see in Jay's last (best) capture. Just a hint. I will be on LF tonite again too. Good luck! [...] Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.83.54 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (73dk7fc[at]googlemail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 7c7a1907d3a7d57b28660e5fb4c32107 Subject: Re: LF: Re[2]: DK7FC T/A last night Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090704080208090609090708" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090704080208090609090708 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Alex, It could be better to go to 136.174 kHz because my signal rises the background noise when it reaches 30 dB S/N and more, as you can see in Jay's last (best) capture. Just a hint. I will be on LF tonite again too. Good luck! 73, Stefan Am 11.04.2014 18:43, schrieb Alex R7NT: > Stefan, Jay and LF enthusiasts, > I'll be tonight on abt 136172,8 > I have no one RX in NA - maybe tonight (?) > > 73! Alex R7NT 136.73.ru > > Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:59:50 +0200 от Stefan Schäfer > : > > Hi Jay, > > Many thanks. Very good reception on your side! > > Unfortunately there are not many stations trying these days on LF. If > the propagation is so good, i guess e.g. R7NT would have had a chance > (correct grammar? ;-) ).... > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 11.04.2014 01:01, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: > > Signal peaked 30 dB s/n in 28 mHz ... > http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html > > ... better s/n than noticed any time during the 'winter' LF season. > > > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 > > > > > > > > --------------090704080208090609090708 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Alex,

It could be better to go to 136.174 kHz because my signal rises the background noise when it reaches 30 dB S/N and more, as you can see in Jay's last (best) capture. Just a hint.
I will be on LF tonite again too.
Good luck!

73, Stefan

Am 11.04.2014 18:43, schrieb Alex R7NT:
Stefan, Jay and LF enthusiasts,
I'll be tonight on abt 136172,8
I have no one RX in NA - maybe tonight (?)

73! Alex R7NT  136.73.ru

Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:59:50 +0200 от Stefan Schäfer <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>:
Hi Jay,

Many thanks. Very good reception on your side!

Unfortunately there are not many stations trying these days on LF. If
the propagation is so good, i guess e.g. R7NT would have had a chance
(correct grammar? ;-) )....

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 11.04.2014 01:01, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net:
> Signal peaked 30 dB s/n in 28 mHz ... http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html
> ... better s/n than noticed any time during the 'winter' LF season.
>
> Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
>
>
>


--------------090704080208090609090708--