Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com
Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp30980igc;
        Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.74.203 with SMTP id w11mr4378173wiv.27.1396728783806;
        Sat, 05 Apr 2014 13:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cx3si2633583wib.94.2014.04.05.13.13.03
        for <daveyxm@virginmedia.com>;
        Sat, 05 Apr 2014 13:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org;
       dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1WWWMf-0005lq-8H
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 20:34:53 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1WWWMe-0005lh-Ol
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 20:34:52 +0100
Received: from mail-we0-f180.google.com ([74.125.82.180])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.82)
	(envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>)
	id 1WWWMd-0000qT-9d
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 20:34:51 +0100
Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p61so4995023wes.11
        for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=zGWWxY+PRcNccy7yIj6S1jw1BsCpwwlfbwaRdeV5c50=;
        b=a60M8qxFb2/EdYKvi0rfuQRfw3ybi1kMYPyMftqv7jm/qgXdkVhp1W7eympGG0Mgyq
         URwTeH/TsNUCix3oHKMU3pEz9Uk2jb7qB5snG5QiBr6KY6gJjQayUYkGuGv9KxVprq07
         Ce23XXLeZS45M0HC3L7/bhRkwu0un2M3Q6LhwwI5BR01blcYlFsC3NOS2Bd5RxrXemM1
         rtEbf5Ld0I1eK6vusXMETRKpMsvI//HzeRcVRqzPpLrlwGYlEP9rdRJcJ9NpcPRyI3zp
         kWyRgUohkVw5D3eE690QglO2NpEKxmrGPfq8wILBjk07xJjGGPUUT7f80Qm6EyNH60Om
         zBqw==
X-Received: by 10.180.76.142 with SMTP id k14mr13733929wiw.21.1396726490689;
        Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u46sm29136571eel.1.2014.04.05.12.34.49
        for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53405AD7.20402@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 21:34:47 +0200
From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <9D9EEA19-6516-4E90-9F32-7B764572EBA0@iz7pdx.it> <534055F7.8000003@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <534055F7.8000003@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  LET US MAKE A LF WSPR PARTY!!! :-) 73! Am 05.04.2014 21:13,
    schrieb DK7FC: > Hi LF, > > There is quite a high LF WSPR activity this evening
    it seems. Some > WSPR-2 activity in the UK convinced me to try WSPR-2 too.
    And it works > ;-) > Now i'm toggling between WSPR-2 and WSPR-15. > Condx
    do NOT look promising but i think we should just ignore that and > put out
    a decent signal to see what we can get. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > PS: That
    is a deep summer hole here, just april!!! > [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
                             trust
                             [74.125.82.180 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (73dk7fc[at]googlemail.com)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-Scan-Signature: 0b2d339ae1d48966556dfb6ad64e2bce
Subject: Re: LF: LF WSPR tonite
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,
	LINES_OF_YELLING autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false

LET US MAKE A LF WSPR PARTY!!! :-)

73!

Am 05.04.2014 21:13, schrieb DK7FC:
> Hi LF,
>
> There is quite a high LF WSPR activity this evening it seems. Some 
> WSPR-2 activity in the UK convinced me to try WSPR-2 too. And it works 
> ;-)
> Now i'm toggling between WSPR-2 and WSPR-15.
> Condx do NOT look promising but i think we should just ignore that and 
> put out a decent signal to see what we can get.
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
> PS: That is a deep summer hole here, just april!!!
>