Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp66994igc; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 15:42:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.205.98.10 with SMTP id cm10mr10798bkc.85.1396651364778; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:42:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ur10si3665072bkb.330.2014.04.04.15.42.43 for ; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:42:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WWCnq-0003na-Q0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 23:41:38 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WWCnq-0003nR-7Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 23:41:38 +0100 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1WWCno-00065l-04 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 23:41:37 +0100 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z2so2134143wiv.0 for ; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:41:35 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=z8060IwFRLC2Kt0rmqPN6U+x6PQr0/zWGqTkIE5WqYY=; b=pAeDFBqH34zzFSz4PdTrh/N4fSNcJK/tRRFC+NKyqDJd9NE7ckQzYwWfti7eYlyVut dJsByzQOawt7tIIC2/lsscolwGzQ0nEDKS8QByiyWE3LQ6TNB3uTmthQinJUZlmpjOeM VPsZEkTGzcl6V9wlhHt6B/Zcmd/Bb790fu/iOvdIgE5AbzXvyb10dYvrM79QqANcHS/e 10jsuc/bAo6BlhJIQCoOw77xyqvCDIb4FuQNHnSWBhV25XjczRa7T13BQMz9QpyHcqzC gLi5CFwVSxu+tvg8hcdfoAIVQGSGpy489z/JdMIYSLe/Odo37+7r7REUTGVsy+fi0zoy fTxA== X-Received: by 10.180.77.200 with SMTP id u8mr7841321wiw.48.1396651295038; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o7sm22532311eew.25.2014.04.04.15.41.33 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <533F351D.2050706@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 00:41:33 +0200 From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1396633890.539117436@f362.i.mail.ru> <2B41B991B80545BC872CEB551CAAC2E8@White> In-Reply-To: <2B41B991B80545BC872CEB551CAAC2E8@White> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Alex, I see you're TXing on 136.173 kHz. That is a good idea! I will join you and if i leave a trace in YV we can get a batter proof of traces and eventual frequency offsets. So i better decide to TX QRSS-60 on 136.1720000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 kHz. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.212.173 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (73dk7fc[at]googlemail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 9b622d5c6a961580a0f289e85f67bcca Subject: Re: LF: info and Q Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090208080609050804000808" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE,LARGE_HEX autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090208080609050804000808 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Alex, I see you're TXing on 136.173 kHz. That is a good idea! I will join you and if i leave a trace in YV we can get a batter proof of traces and eventual frequency offsets. So i better decide to TX QRSS-60 on 136.1720000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 kHz. 73, Stefan Am 04.04.2014 23:35, schrieb Markus Vester: > Alex, > interesting traces from Venezuela... Trying to compare YO and YV > screenshots in detail however doesn't seem to show a good match. One > potential dash at 1:10 UT is on 137777.3 in YV, but on 137777.6 in YO > (and here). Another candidate is on the same frequency (137777.6) but > the timing is different (1:18 in YV and 1:20:30 in YO). > > Marcus, I like your new color for my signal/direction (W.Eu - NA) > Actually just an audio glitch which resulted in swapped left and > right channels for the direction finder. This happens from time to > time, sorry I only noticed it this morning. > > - state's safer for me now ... > If only it was that easy to bring about peace by just flipping red to > blue ... anyway I hope that you and yours will make it safely and > happily through all of that ongoing trouble. > 73 and good luck, > Markus (DF6NM) > > *From:* Alex R7NT > *Sent:* Friday, April 04, 2014 7:51 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* LF: info and Q > > Stefan DK7FC wrote 30.03.2014, 12:27 MSK(GMT+4h): > > > It seems that RA3UDF is a new LF station (?). > first time I see this callsign on LF, but not the first time in the > WSPR database > Leonid has quite a good reception on LF > In Russian reflector nobody knows abt his LF setup > > Abt my beacon's "137777,5 in DFCW120 (DF as in 60s) "RRR..." last > night on EsLoop+200w: > pics from YV7MAE grabber (time 0110-0115) > http://136.73.ru/news/2014/apr/20140404_R7NT_de_YV7MAE_TA60.jpg > > pics from YO/4X1RF grabber > http://136.73.ru/news/2014/apr/20140404_R7NT_de_YO_4X1RF_TA60.jpg > > pics from DF6NM grabber > http://136.73.ru/news/2014/apr/20140404_R7NT_de_DF6NM_TA_0200.jpg > > I see some very humanlike signals abt 137,777.5, but I'm not sure that > is my. > Who was today from NA at this freq? > > Marcus, I like your new color for my signal/direction (W.Eu - NA) - > state's safer for me now ... > > Tonight I'll be on abt 136172,8 in DFCW120 (DF as in 60s) "RRR..." on > WsLoop+200w > Reports welcome > > 73! Alex R7NT 136.73.ru --------------090208080609050804000808 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Alex,

I see you're TXing on 136.173 kHz. That is a good idea! I will join you and if i leave a trace in YV we can get a batter proof of traces and eventual frequency offsets. So i better decide to TX QRSS-60 on 136.1720000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 kHz.

73, Stefan

Am 04.04.2014 23:35, schrieb Markus Vester:
Alex,
 
interesting traces from Venezuela... Trying to compare YO and YV screenshots in detail however doesn't seem to show a good match. One potential dash at 1:10 UT is on 137777.3 in YV, but on 137777.6 in YO (and here). Another candidate is on the same frequency (137777.6) but the timing is different (1:18 in YV and 1:20:30 in YO).
 
> Marcus, I like your new color for my signal/direction (W.Eu - NA)
Actually just an audio glitch which resulted in swapped left and right channels for the direction finder. This happens from time to time, sorry I only noticed it this morning.
 
> - state's safer for me now ...
 If only it was that easy to bring about peace by just flipping red to blue ... anyway I hope that you and yours will make it safely and happily through all of that ongoing trouble.
 
73 and good luck,
 
Markus (DF6NM)

From: Alex R7NT
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 7:51 PM
Subject: LF: info and Q

Stefan DK7FC wrote 30.03.2014, 12:27 MSK(GMT+4h):

> It seems that RA3UDF is a new LF station (?).
first time I see this callsign on LF, but not the first time in the WSPR database
Leonid has quite a good reception on LF
In Russian reflector nobody knows abt his LF setup

Abt my beacon's "137777,5 in DFCW120 (DF as in 60s) "RRR..." last night on EsLoop+200w:
pics from YV7MAE grabber (time 0110-0115)
http://136.73.ru/news/2014/apr/20140404_R7NT_de_YV7MAE_TA60.jpg

pics from YO/4X1RF grabber
http://136.73.ru/news/2014/apr/20140404_R7NT_de_YO_4X1RF_TA60.jpg

pics from DF6NM grabber
http://136.73.ru/news/2014/apr/20140404_R7NT_de_DF6NM_TA_0200.jpg

I see some very humanlike signals abt 137,777.5, but I'm not sure that is my.
Who was today from NA at this freq?

Marcus, I like your new color for my signal/direction (W.Eu - NA) - state's safer for me now ...

Tonight I'll be on abt 136172,8 in DFCW120 (DF as in 60s) "RRR..." on WsLoop+200w
Reports welcome

73! Alex R7NT  136.73.ru
--------------090208080609050804000808--