Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.101 with SMTP id vb5csp121320igc; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:52:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.181.13.40 with SMTP id ev8mr13340895wid.0.1395129134790; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cc9si11535861wjc.116.2014.03.18.00.52.13 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WPo4T-0004rQ-6K for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:04:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WPo4S-0004rH-Bd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:04:20 +0000 Received: from msvw.mvnet.de ([194.25.108.49] helo=vmailpx1.mvnet.de) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WPo4Q-00005i-QA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:04:19 +0000 Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([31.212.54.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by vmailpx1.mvnet.de (/) with ESMTP id s2I78tb1001482 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:09:00 +0100 Message-ID: <5327EFEC.4070701@mvnet.de> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:04:12 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Eberhard_v=2EWedelst=E4dt=22?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20121216 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5327673B.8040507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <53276A0A.7070702@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <53276A0A.7070702@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, BIA is ok, see his sideband 73 Eberhard DL3ZID [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 4d4a9e8f68fb15c54898568240f542c5 Subject: Re: LF: BIA kaputt? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Stefan, BIA is ok, see his sideband 73 Eberhard DL3ZID Am 17.03.2014 22:32, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > Hi MF, > > What is BIA doing tonite? I saw this strange pattern on a few grabbers. > Apart from that, the nice CW signals peaking 50 dB SNR here seem to be > quite unimpressed by these "sidebands"... > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC