Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp21932igc; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:13:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.19.161 with SMTP id g1mr6152612wje.20.1394799218901; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dx1si4031962wib.39.2014.03.14.05.13.38 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WOQeY-0000Wj-4J for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:51:54 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WOQeX-0000WZ-L3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:51:53 +0000 Received: from parrot.netcom.co.uk ([217.72.171.49]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WOQeW-0004Jx-21 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:51:52 +0000 Received: from sb.abelian.org (i-194-106-52-83.freedom2surf.net [194.106.52.83]) by parrot.netcom.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BDF3273F3 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:50:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sb.abelian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BF628A02DF for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5322ED56.9010707@abelian.org> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:51:50 +0000 From: Paul Nicholson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5322775D.3020406@abelian.org> <3293FF91BB5841DB9C5C1F480B6A4943@White> In-Reply-To: <3293FF91BB5841DB9C5C1F480B6A4943@White> X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Signal reports: WH2XBA/1 on 29499 http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140314a.gif http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140314b.gif [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [217.72.171.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: Re: LF: Strong signal 29501 tonight Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Signal reports: WH2XBA/1 on 29499 http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140314a.gif http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140314b.gif Average S/N in 278 uHz: 14.4dB; Significance after 6 hours: 17.5 sigma; WHX2XBA/4 on 29501 http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29501_140314a.gif http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29501_140314b.gif Average S/N in 278 uHz: 13.8dB; Significance after 6 hours: 17.1 sigma; Comparison of phase change: http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/140314a.gif These signals have a message carrying capability of around 180 bits in 6 hours at one code symbol per minute. Unfortunately, none of the data modes used by radio amateurs could come anywhere close to that theoretical limit at VLF. -- Paul Nicholson --