Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp319231igc; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:45:46 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.175.66 with SMTP id by2mr13783030wjc.59.1394145945517; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:45:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ko5si6979047wjc.4.2014.03.06.14.45.45 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:45:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WLgpo-0003Kr-O0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 22:32:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WLgpo-0003Ki-7L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 22:32:12 +0000 Received: from erato-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.10.26]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WLgpm-0005xd-5n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 22:32:11 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from aqua-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.10.60]) by erato-smout.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTP id <0N21003D4D9G7070@erato-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 23:32:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.27] ([84.48.126.215]) by aqua-smin.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0N2100L9UD9F6X30@aqua-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 23:32:04 +0100 (CET) Message-id: <5318F763.6010607@broadpark.no> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 23:32:03 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <006b01cf3969$43a83480$caf89d80$@de> <5318C740.50901@mvnet.de> <5318D051.2080907@freenet.de> <5318DA98.7090606@broadpark.no> <5318E10B.3080701@freenet.de> In-reply-to: <5318E10B.3080701@freenet.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Wolf Thanks for your interesting answer. I used my work email earlier today and it has probably messed up some thing. LA5VNA S [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 0317e2ac8ed27149e57223a21580246d Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Subject: Re: LF: QRV this evening WSQ2 or JT1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Wolf Thanks for your interesting answer. I used my work email earlier today and it has probably messed up some thing. LA5VNA S On 06.03.2014 21:56, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: > Hi Steinar, > > > you wrote: >> Wolf, >> >> Did you get my audio file ? >> >> LA5VNA S > Yes, many thanks for that.. maybe a previous message didn't get out, or > was lost on the way... > > >>> > Ok Steinar, > indeed, completely downloaded now. Maybe I was too quick when trying, > and the file wasn't complete on the server yet. > > I already tried Rik's large wave file, and getting a good decode from > his reception of Domenico. Maybe it's the same strong carrier around > 475.2 kHz (which made copying with the original decoder impossible here). > Since there is no 'intelligent' automatic notch integrated yet, it's > important to adjust the decoding frequency range so that there is no > "carrier" visible between the red (or yellow, for the 2nd channel) > markers in the spectrogram. > With that, Rik's wave file produced the following: > cq cr bq eeiz7tk iz7slz iz7slz > Ok, far from being perfect, but -similar to my favourite mode- it's not > necessary to copy each character 100% error-free. That's part of the > fun, as well as tweaking the parameters. > > > Decoding Steinar's 33 MByte file, with SNR between -15 and -25 dB > (towards the end): > > --- Replay > 'C:\WaveArchive\WSQ_Tests_2014\2014_03_05_LA5VNA_WSQ2_no_decode.wav' --- > ciy8slz de dl4yhf > -12 to -25 d\ > rrr fb but here some errors now e > ownpadh ng 3NBysf frol Sij.@ > tryhog l udsa > n xudtt ad bvk,@h.f@tlzd l4yhf|3 s > > There seemed to be some spectral spreading at the end, irritating the > simple peak-searching loop in the decoder. > But with this file (along with Rik's and my own recordings of IZ7SLZ) I > can now try to modify the decoder and see if a different method for > finding the peak frequencies (equivalent to symbols in WSQ) can improve > the behaviour when multi-path 'widens' the signal. > > All the best, > Wolf . > > >