Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp155413igc; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:16:57 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.71.47 with SMTP id r15mr2205909wju.19.1393964217236; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 12:16:57 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q5si17413247wjq.135.2014.03.04.12.16.56 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 12:16:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WKvGJ-0006us-Hx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:44:23 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WKvGJ-0006uZ-55 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:44:23 +0000 Received: from erato-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.10.26]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WKvGH-0002Oa-GP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:44:21 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from aqua-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.10.60]) by erato-smout.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTP id <0N1X00HLDG5W3H40@erato-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:44:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.27] ([84.48.126.215]) by aqua-smin.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0N1X0065YG5WN520@aqua-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:44:20 +0100 (CET) Message-id: <53162D14.9050001@broadpark.no> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:44:20 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <52FE05BD.6020207@broadpark.no> <52FE0631.8010907@broadpark.no> <52FE308E.9080509@freenet.de> <52FE7EA8.3070607@broadpark.no> <53162A45.2090507@broadpark.no> <53162BCA.7050809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-reply-to: <53162BCA.7050809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes, lack of interest S On 04.03.2014 20:38, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > Hi Steinar, > > If no big gun is needed and there is no activity anyway, then there must > be another reason. Do you have an idea? > > 73, Stefan > > Am 04.03.2014 20:32, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >> Pity if that is the case. It was such a nice mode for us who do not have >> a big gun. >> >> LA5VNA S >> >> >> > > [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: bb61bee384896e075004ae5ec954ddd2 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Yes, lack of interest S On 04.03.2014 20:38, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > Hi Steinar, > > If no big gun is needed and there is no activity anyway, then there must > be another reason. Do you have an idea? > > 73, Stefan > > Am 04.03.2014 20:32, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >> Pity if that is the case. It was such a nice mode for us who do not have >> a big gun. >> >> LA5VNA S >> >> >> > >