Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp64607igc; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 09:55:49 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.73.100 with SMTP id k4mr22937123lbv.25.1393869348695; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:55:48 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p7si22535522lae.38.2014.03.03.09.55.48 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:55:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WKX4p-0001fq-V7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:54:55 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WKX4p-0001fe-HP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:54:55 +0000 Received: from parrot.netcom.co.uk ([217.72.171.49]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WKX4n-0004Uz-PJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:54:54 +0000 Received: from sb.abelian.org (i-194-106-52-83.freedom2surf.net [194.106.52.83]) by parrot.netcom.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183C732740A for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:53:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sb.abelian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD2528A0142 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5314C1EC.6090800@abelian.org> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:54:52 +0000 From: Paul Nicholson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: It is very important at VLF to use effective sferic blanking when looking for weak amateur signals. There are 10 or 20 or more sferics per second and the wanted signal will be lost in the noise when the energy of all those sferics is distributed across your Fourier bins. [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [217.72.171.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) X-Scan-Signature: 3f8d74a8c70dd416d0a3a1dbcb9bb89f Subject: LF: VLF weak signals and sferic blanking Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false It is very important at VLF to use effective sferic blanking when looking for weak amateur signals. There are 10 or 20 or more sferics per second and the wanted signal will be lost in the noise when the energy of all those sferics is distributed across your Fourier bins. Let me illustrate with a plot. Here is a one hour spectrum of Bob's signal with and without sferic blanking, http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140302n.gif As you can see, without the blanking even this strong signal is completely buried by the noise. Effective blanking will discard between 25% and 35% of the incoming signal but will boost the S/N ratio by 20dB or more. The blanking threshold must be set very low to achieve this, roughly 1.2 to 1.5 times the mean level is the optimum. The mean noise floor is conveniently tracked by an exponential moving mean of the absolute signal value (I use time constant of 1 second or so but longer is fine). Some important caveats: First, the input to the blanker must be free of MSK signals, hum harmonics, and any other continuous signals when viewed in the time domain. Two bad things happen otherwise: the blanker mean level tracking will be foiled by the continuous signals, and the chopping action of the blanker will spread the continuous signals across the band to contribute to the noise floor. So, precede the blanker with a filter not wider than say 3 or 4kHz and include notches for any significant mains harmonics or MSK signals that remain within the passband. If you can see them against the noise in the time domain then they need to be notched out. Second - the blanker must see a clear sferic in order to work, so the preceding filter should not be too narrow. 2kHz to 4kHz is enough. 1.5 kHz is starting to get too narrow. The passband doesn't have to be centered on the rx frequency, it can be offset to avoid including some inconvenient continuous signal. While a bit of lightweight sferic blanking is a nicety at higher frequencies, at VLF some serious blanking is essential for detecting weak signals. Nearly every amateur signal I receive is well beneath the un-blanked noise floor. -- Paul Nicholson --