Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <530FBF12.8030306@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 23:41:22 +0100
From: Tobias DG3LV <DG3LV@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <530FB29F.7020209@tiscali.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <530FB29F.7020209@tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Re: LF: BIA NDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Hi Gary !

Confirming your reports. This new carrier at 473.806 is abt. 10 dB 
stronger (average) than the main carrier of BIA (which is 40dB above 
noise). Its QSB is independant of that of BIA, so maybe they are not 
correlated to each other.

BIA seems to have had some problems recently, the carrier had been quite 
"noisy", it looked like there were "lightning strikes" on the waterfall 
of my RX. Then at times the modulation carriers were off, indicating 
that there was some servicing activity on the 3 transmitters.

73 de dg3lv Tobias (QTH = JO53GV)

Am 27.02.2014 22:48, schrieb Gary - G4WGT:
> Hi All,
>
> NDB "BIA" seems to be much stronger than usual, also it seems to have
> QSY'd down a little to 473.800kHz.
> But in saying that it looks like it may be another carrier as I am
> seeing the BIA carrier also strong on its usual frequency 474.000kHz.
>
> See this capture :-
>
> http://1drv.ms/1dFQW7L
>
> You should be able to move backwards & forwards within the series of
> captures.
> Comments please via LF.
>
> --
> *73, de Gary - G4WGT
>
> MF-LF-VLF Grabber :http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/grabber2.html
> Web :http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/index.html*
>
> .
>