Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
MIME-version: 1.0
Message-id: <530BBD2E.3050901@broadpark.no>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:44:14 +0100
From: Steinar Aanesland <saanes@broadpark.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/24.3.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <530BA152.9010301@freenet.de>
In-reply-to: <530BA152.9010301@freenet.de>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: LF: WSQ tests
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hi all


I have been to a local HAM meeting, but my radio with wolf's algorithm
has captured this :
cq cq de "wk f5wk f5wk + k
cq cq pz "wer:qq f5ljk@v K
cq cq rre "wk wo5wk fd~wkxcdp
on 474.200KHz


LA5VNA S


On 24.02.2014 20:45, wolf_dl4yhf wrote:
> Good activity on 474.2 "USB dial" + 1 kHz audio in WSQ at the moment.
> 
> Saw / had a short contact with : F5WK, DD7PD, IZ7SLZ.
> Busy modifying WSQ here.. just received:
> 
>> de  iz7slz
>> ge wolf i saw ur spot
>> cul after dinner
> 
> Ok Domenico, your signal looks much cleaner tonight then yesterday.
> The signal is not stronger, but almost no 'dispersion' (if that explains
> the smeared effect on the waterfall), and error free copy.
> 
> Not sure if this is software-related (WSQ symbols falling into the
> center of an FFT frequency bin or at the borders), or if this is an
> ionospheric effect.
> 
> 73 and cul,
>   Wolf DL4YHF .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>