Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp210467igc; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:32:22 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.24.227 with SMTP id x3mr18207723wif.41.1392730341374; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:32:21 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dh5si12015223wib.9.2014.02.18.05.32.20 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:32:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WFkW5-0003R7-2A for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:15:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WFkW4-0003Qx-GX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:15:16 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WFkW1-0004eD-N6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:15:15 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApwDALFbA1NcGSxF/2dsb2JhbAANTIJCfIk2rg2IXwMCgSuDGQEBAQEDgQkLBwIPCRYIBwkDAgECATQREwYCAQGIDqhSowUXjh8RAVeCLw+BegSFHpMOgTKCZJE6gXE X-IPAS-Result: ApwDALFbA1NcGSxF/2dsb2JhbAANTIJCfIk2rg2IXwMCgSuDGQEBAQEDgQkLBwIPCRYIBwkDAgECATQREwYCAQGIDqhSowUXjh8RAVeCLw+BegSFHpMOgTKCZJE6gXE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,501,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="445235035" Received: from host-92-25-44-69.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([92.25.44.69]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 13:15:12 +0000 Message-ID: <53035CE2.1090801@psk31.plus.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:15:14 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dave That will be an interesting test. I have a couple of similar loops and they just do not work here due to induced noise from the mains, I have tried ground level and bottom of the garden test to no avail. As I get away from one source of noise I start to approach another. I also have a small 'window sill' loop which I took mobile / portable and it performs really well, away from home. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image X-Scan-Signature: 8d5e679c4ecb21aeba32cebcefaae7cb Subject: Re: LF: WSPR Reports - G3XBM, G3ZJO, G4KPX... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090702080702090202080507" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090702080702090202080507 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dave That will be an interesting test. I have a couple of similar loops and they just do not work here due to induced noise from the mains, I have tried ground level and bottom of the garden test to no avail. As I get away from one source of noise I start to approach another. I also have a small 'window sill' loop which I took mobile / portable and it performs really well, away from home. Roger I will put an RX on and run the Grabber to check if I see you. May I suggest that you TX at other than the 6 an 8 minute slots. I TX at 06 etc. and also ruin a little of 08 etc. slots. 73 Eddie On 18/02/2014 12:51, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > Thanks Dave, > > Your reports have been very useful to me. Going to try an > auto-transformer to see if I can match the earth-electrode "loop" any > better later. Added a series inductor yesterday (about 200uH?) which > increased antenna current about 20% > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > > On 18 February 2014 12:23, Dave G3WCB. > wrote: > > > > Chaps, > > I'm aware that you've been using my WSPR reports to gauge the > effectiveness > of your various QRP WSPR transmissions. I'm using a 80cm square > tuned loop > at ground level with a fet pre-amp, feeding my trusty ICOM > IC-PCR1000. I've > tried to keep the RX set up unchanged, but the loop is inclined to > "weathercock" around a bit, especially with the storms recently. > > Also, my WSPR RX doesn't run 24x7, as I use the PC for other duties. > > I went out this morning, and found that the loop is aligned along > an axis > running 60 - 240 deg, which means that stations in the IO92 > direction are > pretty much in the null direction. As an experiment, from 1214 UTC > today I > have aligned the loop antenna in a 165 - 345 deg direction. To > remove any > interaction with the main station "Tee" antenna, which is in the same > general area, I have disconnected this and moved my WSPR TX on to > the short > vertical antenna, which is 30m away from the loop. > > I'll swap the loop back to it's 60 - 240 deg orientation later on > - I'll > announce when I've done this. > > 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM > > > > > > -- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ > http://qss2.blogspot.com/ > http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > > --------------090702080702090202080507 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dave
That will be an interesting test. I have a couple of similar loops and they just do not work here due to induced noise from the mains, I have tried ground level and bottom of the garden test to no avail. As I get away from one source of noise I start to approach another.
I also have a small 'window sill' loop which I took mobile / portable and it performs really well, away from home.

Roger
I will put an RX on and run the Grabber to check if I see you. May I suggest that you TX at other than the 6 an 8 minute slots. I TX at 06 etc. and also ruin a little of 08 etc. slots.

73 Eddie


On 18/02/2014 12:51, Roger Lapthorn wrote:
Thanks Dave,

Your reports have been very useful to me. Going to try an auto-transformer to see if I can match the earth-electrode "loop" any better later. Added a series inductor yesterday (about 200uH?) which increased antenna current about 20%

73s
Roger G3XBM


On 18 February 2014 12:23, Dave G3WCB. <ganymede444@btopenworld.com> wrote:


Chaps,

I'm aware that you've been using my WSPR reports to gauge the effectiveness
of your various QRP WSPR transmissions. I'm using a 80cm square tuned loop
at ground level with a fet pre-amp, feeding my trusty ICOM IC-PCR1000. I've
tried to keep the RX set up unchanged, but the loop is inclined to
"weathercock" around a bit, especially with the storms recently.

Also, my WSPR RX doesn't run 24x7, as I use the PC for other duties.

I went out this morning, and found that the loop is aligned along an axis
running 60 - 240 deg, which means that stations in the IO92 direction are
pretty much in the null direction. As an experiment, from 1214 UTC today I
have aligned the loop antenna in a 165 - 345 deg direction. To remove any
interaction with the main station "Tee" antenna, which is in the same
general area, I have disconnected this and moved my WSPR TX on to the short
vertical antenna, which is 30m away from the loop.

I'll swap the loop back to it's 60 - 240 deg orientation later on - I'll
announce when I've done this.

73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM





--



This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.



--------------090702080702090202080507--