Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp388564igc; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:37:06 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.72.40 with SMTP id a8mr391502lbv.68.1392158225374; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:37:05 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lf2si11178830lbc.53.2014.02.11.14.37.04 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:37:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WDLFI-0001OC-Ma for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:52:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WDLFI-0001O3-36 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:52:00 +0000 Received: from erato-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.10.26]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WDLFG-0005Rc-85 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:51:59 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from aqua-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.10.60]) by erato-smout.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTP id <0N0U00LZ1Q2LJU10@erato-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:51:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([84.48.126.215]) by aqua-smin.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTPA id <0N0U00E9PQ2KWKN0@aqua-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:51:57 +0100 (CET) Message-id: <52FA9B7B.5040808@broadpark.no> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:51:55 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <52FA6028.90105@broadpark.no> <52FA60C8.8010009@broadpark.no> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FCE58C3@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <52FA813D.2070705@broadpark.no> <824FD7B5B55444A78C9C6D049732D1D7@White> In-reply-to: <824FD7B5B55444A78C9C6D049732D1D7@White> X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Rik, Markus I am back tx wspr on 600m now. I have been spotted of G3XKR and EI0CF I will be able to tx in WSQ but not RX at the moment. I have to do something with my TX/RX antenna system [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Subject: Re: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Rik, Markus I am back tx wspr on 600m now. I have been spotted of G3XKR and EI0CF I will be able to tx in WSQ but not RX at the moment. I have to do something with my TX/RX antenna system LA5VNA S On 11.02.2014 22:24, Markus Vester wrote: > Hi Steinar, Rik, > > sounds like fun! Would you like to try to listen on LF ? > > The audio band in the WSQ software seems to be fixed at 1000 Hz, and my LO (dial) is also fixed to 135.5 kHz. So I will attempt to transmit around 136.5 kHz (RF) in a few minutes from now. Due to lower than normal antenna height, my ERP will be only about 0.2 watts or so. > > Best 73, > Markus (DF6NM) > > > From: Steinar Aanesland > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 8:59 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF > > > Hi Rik > > I have no TX antenna at the moment . I am only able to RX > > S la5vna > > > From: Rik Strobbe > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 7:11 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF > > > Hi Steinar, > > are you on for a test? > It very rainy and windy in Belgium, so no TXing tonight, but I can put up a RX station. > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Steinar Aanesland [saanes@broadpark.no] > Verzonden: dinsdag 11 februari 2014 18:41 > Aan: *rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: LF: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF > > A new qso mode to try. > > http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/SOFT/WSQ.htm > > de LA5VNA S >