Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp362965igc; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:11:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.50.15 with SMTP id y15mr77652lbn.74.1392131467845; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:11:07 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id oq4si10050949lbb.177.2014.02.11.07.11.07 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:11:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WDExv-0000Jn-Ip for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:09:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WDExv-0000Je-5p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:09:39 +0000 Received: from mail-yk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WDExt-0003rm-KA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:09:38 +0000 Received: by mail-yk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 10so11404014ykt.4 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:09:35 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ayg4A97WZIJ2FT55tfKLedlPBPhbSJHRD68HtPLGoxo=; b=eUfVW20O6yO1stFOF8vjhXHYI9gjXb7hMXoUhzne5oK/uOq51yU4NiWCu+OWEP/KTc aSGtYoDs09WDgKBBFotVbrnnKQ4NMSxAlGEt/N02djety9F/QwpvjSFsvcMWT97Z0LC1 ivX55+c43K1i0Kg/7Bxc7DdnqTvwCUEjl8svRoGLvKWkABYzvyc0nHXbsjnGT6N7VcmV w+OJ/YPuX5etJmBrJ6/vikVWR6I9PUqoLhe7Bh0fOv5/5ecXuLb+lhWYeGZoZlUdCsE/ BrS4X854tUpuuPue4ZY8q5LOOdQhCubkNnreT7p4MKiMO98siewkk0YtwriflP3OHOts 1uqg== X-Received: by 10.236.152.36 with SMTP id c24mr1229705yhk.118.1392131374813; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:09:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (h111.158.82.166.dynamic.ip.windstream.net. [166.82.158.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a67sm59863526yhj.10.2014.02.11.07.09.34 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:09:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52FA3D02.9000304@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:08:50 -0500 From: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX User-Agent: Messenger 9.0a1 (Windows/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <770BF282-A608-4681-B003-EF0C9C8FB510@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Warren Ziegler wrote: > John, > > Good background information. > A few years ago someone on the U.S. longwave reflector decided that it > was a good idea to pepper the FCC with very pointed and specific > questions. Warren, [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.160.173 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dexter.mc[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Warren Ziegler wrote: > John, > > Good background information. > A few years ago someone on the U.S. longwave reflector decided that it > was a good idea to pepper the FCC with very pointed and specific > questions. Warren, Was that the fellow who was building a monster coil for 1750M in his driveway? Dex