Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <52E7EECC.2090809@freenet.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:54:20 +0100
From: wolf_dl4yhf <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <5C0C35ACD4AA40738B9E1AD11F48D628@F6CNIHPFixe> <52E6F23A.30904@gmx.net> <654211419.20140128103757@mterrier.net> <52E7E603.80604@freenet.de> <3410172538.20140128183856@mterrier.net>
In-Reply-To: <3410172538.20140128183856@mterrier.net>
Subject: LF: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IExGOiBSZTogTEY6IFJlOiBMRjogU0NPT1AgOiBOZXcgc3RhdGk=?=
 =?UTF-8?B?b25zIGFjdGl2ZSBpbiBGcmFuY2Ugb24gTUYgNDcyIOKAkyA0Nzkga0h6IGJhbmQ=?=
 =?UTF-8?B?Lg==?=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------040200080309060507090606"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040200080309060507090606
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Ok Michel,
thanks, and you're not alone .. also a bit of confusion with the buttons 
here, and as usual I didn't look into the manual about the pink colour 
of the 'free msg' field (where I entered the final message, maybe it 
contained too many bits for transmission and didn't get through).

For Andy 'CNI: Here is a comparison with Michel copied from WSPR, just 
received here some minutes ago. Difference about 15 dB.. but chances not 
too bad for an aural CW QSO later in the evening:

1738  -3  0.6   0.475654  0 F5WK JN18 27
1742 -18 -1.0   0.475632  0 F6CNI JN19 13
1742 -25 -0.6   0.475792  0 IW4DXW JN64 40
1744 -14 -0.1   0.475654  0 F5WK JN18 27
1748 -20 -2.0   0.475632  0 F6CNI JN19 13
1748 -20 -1.1   0.475660  0 I5EFO JN53 30
1748 -17 -0.6   0.475792  0 IW4DXW JN64 40
1750 -12  0.0   0.475654  0 F5WK JN18 27


Michel's signal at -3dB was audible here already.
But as usual, the QSB is extreme (F5WK: between -3 and -14 dB within a 
few minutes).

73,
   Wolf .


Am 28.01.2014 18:38, schrieb Michel Brunel:
> Re: LF: Re: LF: Re: LF: SCOOP : New stations active in France on MF 
> 472 – 479 kHz band. Hi Wolf,
>
> Pleased to have a nice QSO, even if the op this side got a bit 
> confused with some buttons !
> Yes, I had plenty of time to build a decent MF station, waiting for a 
> permit
>
> 73,
>
> Michel - f5wk
>
> 	Hello Michel,
>
> Thanks for the QSO and the info - your JT9-1 signal was mostly audible 
> in 2.7 kHz audio bandwidth.
>
> Most of my MF station (especially the RX) is also PIC controlled - not 
> via DDS but old-fashioned DTMF tones ;-)
>
> 73,
>   Wolf DL4YHF
>   QTH Spenge near Bielefeld, JO42FD
>
>
>
> Am 28.01.2014 10:37, schrieb Michel Brunel:
>
> Hello Tobias,
>
> Thanks for the JT9 QSO and the good report.
> I've been using 200 watt RF power into a rather inefficient antenna: 
> 10 meter high, with almost no toploading.
>
> For transmit, I use a "direct link" to the WSJTx software to get the 
> 65 channel symbols  as a lookup table.
> Then they are sent to a PIC driving a DDS. Everything is under the 
> control of the WSJTx software (TX frequency ,PTT, messages)
>
> 73,
>
> Michel - F5WK
>
>
>
>
> /-- /


--------------040200080309060507090606
Content-Type: multipart/related;
 boundary="------------010209020306080401040402"


--------------010209020306080401040402
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Ok Michel, <br>
      thanks, and you're not alone .. also a bit of confusion with the
      buttons here, and as usual I didn't look into the manual about the
      pink colour of the 'free msg' field (where I entered the final
      message, maybe it contained too many bits for transmission and
      didn't get through).<br>
      <br>
      For Andy 'CNI: Here is a comparison with Michel copied from WSPR,
      just received here some minutes ago. Difference about 15 dB.. but
      chances not too bad for an aural CW QSO later in the evening:<br>
      <br>
      1738  -3  0.6   0.475654  0 F5WK JN18 27<br>
      1742 -18 -1.0   0.475632  0 F6CNI JN19 13<br>
      1742 -25 -0.6   0.475792  0 IW4DXW JN64 40<br>
      1744 -14 -0.1   0.475654  0 F5WK JN18 27<br>
      1748 -20 -2.0   0.475632  0 F6CNI JN19 13<br>
      1748 -20 -1.1   0.475660  0 I5EFO JN53 30<br>
      1748 -17 -0.6   0.475792  0 IW4DXW JN64 40<br>
      1750 -12  0.0   0.475654  0 F5WK JN18 27<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      Michel's signal at -3dB was audible here already.<br>
      But as usual, the QSB is extreme (F5WK: between -3 and -14 dB
      within a few minutes).<br>
      <br>
      73,<br>
        Wolf .<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      Am 28.01.2014 18:38, schrieb Michel Brunel:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:3410172538.20140128183856@mterrier.net"
      type="cite">
      <title>Re: LF: Re: LF: Re: LF: SCOOP : New stations active in
        France on MF 472 – 479 kHz band.</title>
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <span style=" font-family:'Calibri'; font-size: 12pt;">Hi Wolf,<br>
        <br>
        Pleased to have a nice QSO, even if the op this side got a bit
        confused with some buttons !<br>
        Yes, I had plenty of time to build a decent MF station, waiting
        for a permit <img alt=""
          src="cid:part1.05050108.06070803@freenet.de" height="18"
          hspace="1" vspace="1" width="18"><br>
        <br>
        73,<br>
        <br>
        Michel - f5wk<br>
      </span>
      <table bgcolor="#ffffff">
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td bgcolor="#0000ff" width="2"><br>
            </td>
            <td><span style=" font-family:'calibri'; font-size: 12pt;">Hello
                Michel,<br>
                <br>
                Thanks for the QSO and the info - your JT9-1 signal was
                mostly audible in 2.7 kHz audio bandwidth.<br>
                <br>
                Most of my MF station (especially the RX) is also PIC
                controlled - not via DDS but old-fashioned DTMF tones
                ;-)<br>
                <br>
                73,<br>
                  Wolf DL4YHF <br>
                  QTH Spenge near Bielefeld, JO42FD<br>
                <br>
                <br>
                <br>
                Am 28.01.2014 10:37, schrieb Michel Brunel:</span></td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <span style=" font-family:'calibri'; font-size: 12pt;">Hello
        Tobias,<br>
        <br>
        Thanks for the JT9 QSO and the good report.<br>
        I've been using 200 watt RF power into a rather inefficient
        antenna: 10 meter high, with almost no toploading.<br>
        <br>
        For transmit, I use a "direct link" to the WSJTx software to get
        the 65 channel symbols  as a lookup table.<br>
        Then they are sent to a PIC driving a DDS. Everything is under
        the control of the WSJTx software (TX frequency ,PTT, messages)<br>
         <br>
        73,<br>
        <br>
        Michel - F5WK<br>
        <br>
        <br>
        <br>
        <br>
        <span style=" font-family:'arial'; font-size: 8pt; color:
          #c0c0c0;"><i>-- 
          </i></span></span></blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------010209020306080401040402
Content-Type: image/gif
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: <part1.05050108.06070803@freenet.de>

R0lGODlhEgASALMPAPzcLNGPFGlPEqRzD/bIIHhnOOmvGfzWJPzmLPzaJKSafPziLPzeJEQ2
FPziJP///yH5BAEAAA8ALAAAAAASABIAAASi8MmpihBFzU1FMARhDILGPcVwJAADHOJQcIIB
OAuCO0kYCJRAYuFoIHQNQG9kEhxyiIYDsZC+RECFcFqlFhcMGLNgWxClZwdjGbAQEo4dkRgX
/wSEgxTHIDL+egY/ZHoMcWpxawQNghkDeQ1/an9hjEwPNZBrazCWPxIKAyCLDaWlBoIDJpgf
Ia6oqUAbKbCwAQEyJw8KAgO3tySruhUXGScRADs=
--------------010209020306080401040402--

--------------040200080309060507090606--