Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp42414igc; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 04:09:59 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.187.36 with SMTP id fp4mr712895wic.9.1388750999129; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:09:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k8si21789753wje.69.2014.01.03.04.09.58 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:09:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vz33D-0001wq-MG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 11:36:27 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vz33D-0001wh-8g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 11:36:27 +0000 Received: from out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz33B-0004iP-IE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 11:36:26 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgoSAKKfxlICZMwS/2dsb2JhbAANS4JHAgUNaLECiFkBAwEBgSODGQEBAQEDVTQLAQMDAg8JFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBAYgNqBaabBeOKBEBVxaEIASYF4EwlBGBcQ X-IPAS-Result: AgoSAKKfxlICZMwS/2dsb2JhbAANS4JHAgUNaLECiFkBAwEBgSODGQEBAQEDVTQLAQMDAg8JFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBAYgNqBaabBeOKBEBVxaEIASYF4EwlBGBcQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,597,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217";a="94125237" Received: from host-2-100-204-18.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.204.18]) by out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 03 Jan 2014 11:36:24 +0000 Message-ID: <52C6A0C0.1010304@psk31.plus.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 11:36:32 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <77b5cb75512341e2ae8e3de50ce543c6@kabelmail.de> <0B835F188CF5470985D6D2049CD6637A@White> <5944E546F83E44C7BEE11A31F287C5CB@White> In-Reply-To: <5944E546F83E44C7BEE11A31F287C5CB@White> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140102-1, 02/01/2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 03/01/2014 11:10, Markus Vester wrote: > Peter, ok. But I still have a problem with the railway QRM on 8270, so > I'd prefer either 8275 or 8280... > What do the others think? Chris, Eddie, Gerhard, Haldór, Jim, > Laurence, Lubos, Paul, Stefan ? [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20 BODY: HTML: images with 1600-2000 bytes of words 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.3 HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3 HTML is very short with a linked image 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image X-Scan-Signature: f1498eebf16822c5ea85527a90413169 Subject: Re: VLF: 8.275 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050209010504080605050204" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050209010504080605050204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 03/01/2014 11:10, Markus Vester wrote: > Peter, ok. But I still have a problem with the railway QRM on 8270, so > I'd prefer either 8275 or 8280... > What do the others think? Chris, Eddie, Gerhard, Haldór, Jim, > Laurence, Lubos, Paul, Stefan ? Hi Marcus / LF Job for today is to set up some Grabber windows for 8275, 8280 region, if you have problems with 8270 it is a good reason to for all to look elsewhere, fine by me. Reports and Grabber views later today. 73 Eddie G3ZJO --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com --------------050209010504080605050204 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 03/01/2014 11:10, Markus Vester wrote:
Peter, ok. But I still have a problem with the railway QRM on 8270, so I'd prefer either 8275 or 8280...
 
What do the others think? Chris, Eddie, Gerhard, Haldór, Jim, Laurence, Lubos, Paul, Stefan ?

Hi Marcus / LF

Job for today is to set up some Grabber windows for 8275, 8280 region, if you have problems with 8270 it is a good reason to for all to look elsewhere, fine by me.
Reports and Grabber views later today.

73 Eddie G3ZJO





This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.


--------------050209010504080605050204--