Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp729200igc; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 04:09:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.235.230 with SMTP id up6mr41305500wjc.30.1388318948181; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 04:09:08 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id so3si15531341wic.18.2013.12.29.04.09.07 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 04:09:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VxF6G-0003sS-6b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 12:04:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VxF6F-0003sJ-O2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 12:04:07 +0000 Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([195.4.92.91]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VxF6D-00022z-8E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 12:04:06 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.141] (helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1VxF6C-0001xU-Bz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:04:04 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:52565 helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1VxF6C-0001WJ-83 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:04:04 +0100 Received: from mx4.freenet.de ([195.4.92.14]:45636) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1VxF3E-0000WC-TR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:01:00 +0100 Received: from blfd-4d080c18.pool.mediaways.net ([77.8.12.24]:4144 helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mx4.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1VxF3E-0002pI-EC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:01:00 +0100 Message-ID: <52C00EF9.6040503@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:00:57 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <52C001C9.2040701@freenet.de> <3B436E4755E1447F8AFED31AEAE746F3@White> In-Reply-To: <3B436E4755E1447F8AFED31AEAE746F3@White> X-Originated-At: 77.8.12.24!4144 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Markus and all, > BTW Yahoo was fine for me until they invented and imposed their "neo" > format on the groups. It's so overloaded, and here on my little > laptop, useful content is confined to exactly 20 % screen area: > http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/Yahoo_neo_vlfgroup.png (62 kB) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.91 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7 Subject: Re: LF: Interesting discussion about VLF propagation / running LWPC code on yahoo Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070205050709040401090803" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2373 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070205050709040401090803 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Markus and all, > BTW Yahoo was fine for me until they invented and imposed their "neo" > format on the groups. It's so overloaded, and here on my little > laptop, useful content is confined to exactly 20 % screen area: > http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/Yahoo_neo_vlfgroup.png (62 kB) Yes, and these are just a few of the annoyances caused by their "neo" thing. Being unable (as moderator of a group) to erase files from the "files" section is another one. But isn't it sooo nice to be informed, anytime, anywhere, about top cruises sold at the local discounter ? :o) 73, Wolf . --------------070205050709040401090803 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Markus and all,
 
BTW Yahoo was fine for me until they invented and imposed their "neo" format on the groups. It's so overloaded, and here on my little laptop, useful content is confined to exactly 20 % screen area:
 

Yes, and these are just a few of the annoyances caused by their "neo" thing. Being unable (as moderator of a group) to erase files from the "files" section is another one. But isn't it sooo nice to be informed, anytime, anywhere, about top cruises sold at the local discounter ? :o)

73,
  Wolf .



--------------070205050709040401090803--