Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp525864igc; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 02:24:15 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.241.228 with SMTP id wl4mr29782750wjc.2.1388053454806; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 02:24:14 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d7si11892391wix.78.2013.12.26.02.24.14 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 02:24:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vw7i9-0008Pc-0T for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:58:37 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vw7i8-0008PT-A0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:58:36 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vw7i4-0005jV-4O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:58:35 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArEBALj0u1JcGS2K/2dsb2JhbAANS4JHfE+mXJJ3gSqDGQEBAQEDSQwSHgQLBwIIBAEBAQkWAQcHCQMCAQIBNAkIEwYCAQGHbAMZBa5Ck1IIEoZFF40KGYEYEQEgHhgBBoQwBIFTlkSBMIstiGSBcQ X-IPAS-Result: ArEBALj0u1JcGS2K/2dsb2JhbAANS4JHfE+mXJJ3gSqDGQEBAQEDSQwSHgQLBwIIBAEBAQkWAQcHCQMCAQIBNAkIEwYCAQGHbAMZBa5Ck1IIEoZFF40KGYEYEQEgHhgBBoQwBIFTlkSBMIstiGSBcQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,553,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217";a="440485721" Received: from host-92-25-45-138.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.25.45.138]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 26 Dec 2013 09:58:30 +0000 Message-ID: <52BBFDC4.3010507@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:58:28 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <2f507c1ff91346b2b8adba0518611224@kabelmail.de> <39966C71EF4543899F81399598C190F7@Extensa> In-Reply-To: <39966C71EF4543899F81399598C190F7@Extensa> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 131225-1, 25/12/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi All Yes, yesterday was quieter on 8.9KHz with less *cat*astrophic noise pulses. This meant that although Uwe's signal was less strong than during other tests I was in the *cat*chment area. The low signal level means there are breaks in the line here in both 424uH and 47uHz FFT but I was able to *cat*ch some nice periods when the signal in 47uHz was10dB above the noise peaks. I can *cat*egorically confirm reception. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image X-Scan-Signature: 21f1dd9e5d349c4603888a79aa965668 Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020607000707040605030409" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3505 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020607000707040605030409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi All Yes, yesterday was quieter on 8.9KHz with less *cat*astrophic noise pulses. This meant that although Uwe's signal was less strong than during other tests I was in the *cat*chment area. The low signal level means there are breaks in the line here in both 424uH and 47uHz FFT but I was able to *cat*ch some nice periods when the signal in 47uHz was10dB above the noise peaks. I can *cat*egorically confirm reception. Thanks Uwe and (Tom DL8*CAT*) for the signal. 73 Eddie G3ZJO http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm On 26/12/2013 09:30, PA1SDB, Peter wrote: > UWE, Very stable frequency here yesterday. > 73's, Peter PA1SDB > www.qsl.net/pa1sdb > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 25, 2013 3:16 PM > *Subject:* Re: Re: VLF: 8969.99 > > Hi Markus, > its true, this moment our cat is terrorizing his neighbor fellows. > > Snatches of sunshine here around. > > GL, Uwe/dj8wx > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Gesendet: 25.12.2013 14:57 > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Betreff: Re: VLF: 8969.99 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Cat alarm! > Today noise and QRM is very low here, and now there's a clear > trace on my grabber > http://df6nm.darc.de/vlf/vlfgrabber.htm > ... about 13 dB SNR in 0.47 mHz, and even faintly visible in "600" > 3.8 mHz. Better than ever! > May well show up on Eddie's grabber again > http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23312120/vlfgrabber.html > Best 73, > Markus (DF6NM) > > *From:* Markus Vester > *Sent:* Monday, December 23, 2013 11:44 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Subject:* Re: VLF: 8969.99 > > Hi Jim, > didn't see the cat myself, he was betrayed to me by others > Lubos http://www.ok2bvg.cz/vlfgrabber/ > Paul http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=1387832400&b=080&s=sp > > Peter http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/ > Stefan > http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html > Apparently Uwe's cat's carrier was on air today from 17 to 21 UT, > but not this morning. Unfortunately my own grabber is too noisy to > catch much of it, except for the odd bright pixel. > 73 and good luck, > Markus (DF6NM) > > *From:* hvanesce > *Sent:* Monday, December 23, 2013 11:18 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Subject:* RE: VLF: 8969.99 > > Uwe and Markus, > > Was he out from about 02:15 to 03:15? I?m trying to interpret > using Markus? grabber. > > Hope springs eternal here that with management of natural noise, > continuous monitoring and luck I might detect TA signals. I was > making receiver modifications for noise mitigation (i.e. receiver > off) approximately 01:00 ? 10:00. If I had known that it wasn?t > raining at 0200 I would postponed my receiver noise modifications. > > I am running multiple windows at different bandwidths (thanks > everyone for your previous advice on this) to enhance the chance > of detection with arbitrary on/off (rain/dry) periods. > > 73, Jim AA5BW > > *From:*owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] *On Behalf Of > *uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de > *Sent:* Monday, December 23, 2013 1:59 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: VLF: 8969.99 > > Yes, Markus, but he is back agn. > GL, Uwe > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Gesendet: 23.12.2013 20:52 > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Betreff: VLF: 8969.99 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Hey Uwe, your cat's on walkabout again! 73, Markus > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > > --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com --------------020607000707040605030409 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi All

Yes, yesterday was quieter on 8.9KHz with less catastrophic noise pulses. This meant that although Uwe's signal was less strong than during other tests I was in the catchment area. The low signal level means there are breaks in the line here in both 424uH and 47uHz FFT but I was able to catch some nice periods when the signal in 47uHz was10dB above the noise peaks. I can categorically confirm reception.

Thanks Uwe and (Tom DL8CAT) for the signal.

73 Eddie G3ZJO
http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm

On 26/12/2013 09:30, PA1SDB, Peter wrote:
UWE, Very stable frequency here yesterday.
73's, Peter PA1SDB
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: Re: VLF: 8969.99

Hi Markus,
its true, this moment our cat is terrorizing his neighbor fellows.

Snatches of sunshine here around.

GL, Uwe/dj8wx
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Gesendet: 25.12.2013 14:57
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: Re: VLF: 8969.99

Cat alarm!
 
Today noise and QRM is very low here, and now there's a clear trace on my grabber
... about 13 dB SNR in 0.47 mHz, and even faintly visible in "600" 3.8 mHz. Better than ever!
 
May well show up on Eddie's grabber again
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 

Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99

Hi Jim,
 
didn't see the cat myself, he was betrayed to me by others
 
 
Apparently Uwe's cat's carrier was on air today from 17 to 21 UT, but not this morning. Unfortunately my own grabber is too noisy to catch much of it, except for the odd bright pixel.
 
73 and good luck,
Markus (DF6NM)
 

From: hvanesce
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:18 PM
Subject: RE: VLF: 8969.99

Uwe and Markus,

Was he out from about 02:15 to 03:15? I?m trying to interpret using Markus? grabber.

Hope springs eternal here that with management of natural noise, continuous monitoring and luck I might detect TA signals. I was making receiver modifications for noise mitigation (i.e. receiver off) approximately 01:00 ? 10:00. If I had known that it wasn?t raining at 0200 I would postponed my receiver noise modifications.

I am running multiple windows at different bandwidths (thanks everyone for your previous advice on this) to enhance the chance of detection with arbitrary on/off (rain/dry) periods.

73, Jim AA5BW

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 1:59 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99

Yes, Markus, but he is back agn.
GL, Uwe

Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Gesendet: 23.12.2013 20:52
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: VLF: 8969.99

Hey Uwe, your cat's on walkabout again!  73, Markus



This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.





This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.


--------------020607000707040605030409--