Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.138 with SMTP id ds10csp39056igb; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:58:10 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.9.100 with SMTP id y4mr7083634wja.22.1387043889366; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:58:09 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b3si1227105wix.85.2013.12.14.09.58.08 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:58:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VrrTB-0002k9-7E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:49:33 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VrrTA-0002k0-K9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:49:32 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VrrT8-0000WB-Nm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:49:31 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.11] ([79.242.210.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MPlY2-1Vwn9Z43D0-004wvd for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 16:49:28 +0100 Message-ID: <52AC7E0F.9010901@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 16:49:35 +0100 From: Hartmut Wolff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <6514E2CA89B64F1BB9851B892A35C91A@White> In-Reply-To: <6514E2CA89B64F1BB9851B892A35C91A@White> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:h6+28NmQdgig64FP0mqrIKI8Bvo2MUjSpMG0sdZxgn3ywKNVMZn JQNfyG9m+QfyRZDerV9BGSIJm7oZO+5l3aoToYbSNZa7XXVmq8VKGk+fx5yJYnbKdfvNSQR qwMaAdc7Ba9LniNDNJSFex8wTR5F6QNV9/60nF62m7XTKlpW02xGSBOz6RuQjHTV2mk/DYW tuPSCFkJcfR6JzmvXF1ig== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Here is a screenshot how 72.7 dial here looks. http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/Eu_Loran_frequencies_74300-74325Hz.txt 74321 is better than 74304, but not optimal because the Loran line on 74320.3 is to close I think. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.15.18 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (h-wolff[at]gmx.de) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: c9d6a1e47761f7ec7375ac340bef30d0 Subject: Re: LF: All 73 Banders... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2165 Here is a screenshot how 72.7 dial here looks. http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/Eu_Loran_frequencies_74300-74325Hz.txt 74321 is better than 74304, but not optimal because the Loran line on 74320.3 is to close I think. -- 73 Hartmut Am 2013-12-14 16:03, schrieb Markus Vester: > Hmmm - capturing Bob's WSPR is a bit like crossing a four lane highway by foot: Once you've managed to find a gap between the DCF trails, you'll be hit by a Loran line on the next track... > > Glad to see that Joe DF2JP managed to get some decodes, probably for the first time. His capture shows significant DCF77 "junk", the effect of which we have apparently reduced successfully. > > Around midnight there were also some meager traces here, but simply not enough SNR to decode. I have marked the four tones with 0.1831 Hz spacing with green arrow heads on > http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/df6nm_74kHz_131214_0200_arrowheads.png > Unfortunately 74612 Hz would not be good here. > > It's however strange that Hartmut and Victor didn't get any decodes, even though the signal seemed to be well visible for both. What looks like noise on Victor's capture must really be the WSPR-15 spectrum: > http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/pa3fny_74603_131214_0700_arrowheads.jpg > > But both statiopns have a relatively strong Loran line, and Hartmut's directional antenna is pointing towards Sylt. However the nearby line frequency 74603.280 Hz should have been well outside the occupied spectrum of Bob's WSPR signal (74603.51 to 604.24), so it's not ovbvious why it should have prevented decodes. I'm speculating that the WSPR software finds the strong line, tries to sync to it, and then somehow excludes nearby real signals from further decode attempts. To prove the point and see how much spacing is needed, we could experiment with letting WSPR decode local audio signals in the presence of injected carriers. But systematic trials with WSPR tend to be time-consuming, even if such tests were accelerated by scaling to WSPR-2. > > As Bob says, the best solution would be to move further out, avoiding the DCF77 sideband lobes alltogether: > http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/74kHz_spectrum_investigation_df6nm_131214.png > shows different parts of the spectrum in detail. My idea would be to move down by 300 Hz, ie 72.7 kHz dial and 74.300 to 74.325 kHz RF for WSPR-15. In that range, DCF noise is so weak that we would only neeed to avoid the more widely spaced Loran lines. I have listed and sorted the relevant GRI harmonics at > http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/Eu_Loran_frequencies_74300-74325Hz.png > http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/Eu_Loran_frequencies_74300-74325Hz.txt > but note that emitted levels are variable, and not every line will really be strong enough to cause interference. > > Thus my suggestion would be to go to 72.7 kHz dial, and Bob sending on either 74304 or 74321 Hz. > > Best 73, > Markus (DF6NM) > > > > > From: Bob Raide > Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 8:41 AM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; Bob Raide > Subject: LF: All 73 Banders... > > > I am authorized 68-76 kHz. There must be clear freqs somewhere in that spectrum? Let me know what most would like to try in UK/Europe-Bob WG2XRS/4 NY [WG4XRS for WSPR modes] > -- 73 Hartmut www.h-wolff.de Locator: JO52hp