Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp103584igb; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 15:25:59 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.221.38 with SMTP id qb6mr15427867wic.8.1385940358461; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 15:25:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cd6si28418420wjc.57.2013.12.01.15.25.57 for ; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 15:25:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VnFsd-0004Z1-0y for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:52:47 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VnFsc-0004Ys-B3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:52:46 +0000 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VnFsZ-0008Nd-VK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:52:45 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlMDACO9m1JOlnJa/2dsb2JhbAANTIJDfE2IXK97AwKBMIMZAQEBAQNJKRMECwkIBAEBAQgBFggHCQMCAQIBFCAJCBMFAQIBAYdrAxeuEYkJGocnF44gbgEGhC0DmBSMXYhf X-IPAS-Result: AlMDACO9m1JOlnJa/2dsb2JhbAANTIJDfE2IXK97AwKBMIMZAQEBAQNJKRMECwkIBAEBAQgBFggHCQMCAQIBFCAJCBMFAQIBAYdrAxeuEYkJGocnF44gbgEGhC0DmBSMXYhf X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,807,1378854000"; d="scan'208,217";a="595184890" Received: from host-78-150-114-90.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([78.150.114.90]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2013 22:52:42 +0000 Message-ID: <529BBDBA.1060706@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:52:42 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 131201-1, 01/12/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 01/12/2013 22:44, PA1SDB, Peter wrote: > In my oppinion the signal was buch better on 8969,996 in relation to > 8970,022 Hz. > Is it possible to make a sweep from xx to xx ? > Peter, PA1SDB > www.qsl.net/pa1sdb [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: efdc09b6b31095aa2dc5c6d2552910d5 Subject: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030904040602020900080307" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2140 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030904040602020900080307 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/12/2013 22:44, PA1SDB, Peter wrote: > In my oppinion the signal was buch better on 8969,996 in relation to > 8970,022 Hz. > Is it possible to make a sweep from xx to xx ? > Peter, PA1SDB > www.qsl.net/pa1sdb Wait a minute I was receiving at that time and saw absolutely nothing, does that not point to a local source to Peter. I did post a message to ask where it originated as I detected nothing. Eddie G3ZJO > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Sunday, December 01, 2013 10:39 PM > *Subject:* Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. > > Hi Peter, > may be the generator was out of control. as told here I had some > trouble with it. > GL > Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Gesendet: 01.12.2013 21:51 > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Hello Uwe, > I'm wondering what was/is the difference between that 8969,996 Hz > transmission Saturday (A) and this Sunday transmission (B) on > 8970,022 Hz ? > There where some unstabillity's here localy, so perhaps the reason > is something here localy ????? > I did start the PC, and connected a car battery loader at (18h00) > front of that bright part befor A > I did diconnect the loader (05h33) at A and the signal dissapared > to... > Later on the signal became bright and clear at 8970,022 Hz. > Wondering why the signal befor mark *A *was better in relation to > *B*** > Was it you on 8969,996 Hz ? > Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB > --------------030904040602020900080307 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 01/12/2013 22:44, PA1SDB, Peter wrote:
In my oppinion the signal was buch better on 8969,996 in relation to 8970,022 Hz.
Is it possible to make a sweep from xx to xx ?
 
Peter, PA1SDB
 

Wait a minute I was receiving at that time and saw absolutely nothing, does that not point to a local source to Peter. I did post a message to ask where it originated as I detected nothing.

Eddie G3ZJO
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.

Hi Peter,
may be the generator was out of control. as told here I had some trouble with it.
GL
Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Gesendet: 01.12.2013 21:51
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.

Hello Uwe,
I'm wondering what was/is the difference between that 8969,996 Hz transmission Saturday (A) and this Sunday transmission (B) on 8970,022 Hz ?
 
There where some unstabillity's here localy, so perhaps the reason is something here localy ?????
 
I did start the PC, and connected a car battery loader at (18h00) front of that bright part befor A
I did diconnect the loader (05h33) at A and the signal dissapared to...
Later on the signal became bright and clear at 8970,022 Hz.
 
Wondering why the signal befor mark A was better in relation to B 
 
Was it you on 8969,996 Hz ?
 
 
 
Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB
 
 
 

--------------030904040602020900080307--