Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com
Received: by 10.50.93.2 with SMTP id cq2csp43200igb;
Sun, 8 Sep 2013 11:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.87.38 with SMTP id u6mr5645705wiz.0.1378663357946;
Sun, 08 Sep 2013 11:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id wy3si3146014wjc.103.1969.12.31.16.00.00;
Sun, 08 Sep 2013 11:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org;
dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1VIifO-0003qf-1q
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:20:54 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1VIifN-0003qW-L0
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:20:53 +0100
Received: from omr-m06.mx.aol.com ([64.12.143.80])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <g4gvw@aol.com>)
id 1VIifL-0003Oa-UG
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:20:52 +0100
Received: from mtaout-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.5])
by omr-m06.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 454CE700308CD;
Sun, 8 Sep 2013 13:20:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-92-7-226-93.as43234.net [92.7.226.93])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mtaout-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id A709DE00009C;
Sun, 8 Sep 2013 13:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <522CB1ED.3080603@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:20:45 +0100
From: pat <g4gvw@aol.com>
Organization: G4GVW
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
CC: Warren Ziegler <wd2xgj@gmail.com>
References: <CAMFjj72EVAUx61a7rZeR41ufXx4z2A2h+UK+DYBj=EPqd0waxg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMFjj72EVAUx61a7rZeR41ufXx4z2A2h+UK+DYBj=EPqd0waxg@mail.gmail.com>
x-aol-global-disposition: G
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com;
s=20121107; t=1378660848;
bh=KeZmYL1BxHnASvM3hozLZ/W6yvUctaXfMruaY/j3YtQ=;
h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=uEXQGP+ytZvE+q5AM4CVUBxAuQvrW3mhOScIrVFAwbsL0fG2cTdIk2rYAsID14nUk
07bnTvG4m/EHmh+woN15mD08jAr6+mFuXdB/XsZFxmpIwNjJ4SaAnZ3xJmzpoMTsjp
RejSIIqzWcaVhFHd9VGSlOzSxzY/aRV8xqzJMCY0=
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d2905522cb1ef32e9
X-AOL-IP: 92.7.226.93
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Warren, While many of us (particularly those of us of a certain
age) have an affection stretching back to near childhood for that publication
it is not for nothing that we nickname it "Practically Witless Monthly" :>)
[...]
Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[64.12.143.80 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(g4gvw[at]aol.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056
Subject: Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 2344
Warren,
While many of us (particularly those of us of a certain age) have an
affection stretching back to near childhood for that publication it is
not for nothing that we nickname it "Practically Witless Monthly" :>)
73
On 08/09/13 02:53, Warren Ziegler wrote:
>
> Tony Nailer G4CFY has a bit in his "Practical Wireless" column
> "Technical for the terrified" this month on the 137 kHz band in which
> he writes it off as worthless.
>
> "With the limitation of antenna efficiency together with a bandwidth
> of only 100Hz, there really isn't much that can be done with this band."
>
> Anyone on the list know Tony?
> Who is in the best position to write a rebuttal that PW will publish?
>
>
> --
> 73 Warren K2ORS
> WD2XGJ
> WD2XSH/23
> WE2XEB/2
> WE2XGR/1
>
--
73 de pat g4gvw
es gd dx
qth nr Felixstowe
East Coast UK