Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.1.100 with SMTP id 4csp128879igl; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:23:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.181.12.10 with SMTP id em10mr4219260wid.14.1373721836019; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id yo8si14735988wjc.56.2013.07.13.06.23.55 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UxzNV-0008Mr-5S for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:56:45 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UxzNU-0008Mi-PP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:56:44 +0100 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews01.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.4]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UxzNT-0007E0-7W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:56:43 +0100 Received: from cpsps-ews01.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.168]) by cpsmtpb-ews01.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:56:42 +0200 Received: from CPSMTPM-CMT105.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.21]) by cpsps-ews01.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:56:42 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([62.131.23.134]) by CPSMTPM-CMT105.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.0.6002.18264); Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:56:42 +0200 Message-ID: <51E14E8A.9080104@kpnmail.nl> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:56:42 +0200 From: pa3abk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51D498BD.3050007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <005b01ce798a$b0476600$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <20130706131640.GG5246@cs.utwente.nl> <7D6B8CBB38964C9C82487F5D0F3648FC@FMVXD1232> <20130707203537.GA30691@cs.utwente.nl> <51DA00C8.6000600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DA0212.8020808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DA03CE.6020508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DA1680.6030602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DB6CB3.2080708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001601ce7c95$f235b360$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <51DBFF7D.9050807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DC58E9.5030005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DF1D06.8020208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DF43E7.8080300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51E147E2.8080302@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <51E147E2.8080302@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jul 2013 12:56:42.0667 (UTC) FILETIME=[6C4067B0:01CE7FC8] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 13-7-2013 14:28, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > .... > Due to the lower signal levels of the short active dipole i now > resonated the antenna to 630m, where i plan to do my tests. This > prevents IM and causes a significant gain! > ..... Assume the whip itself is tuned and not the longwire TX antenna next to it :-) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.4 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 0b2d339ae1d48966556dfb6ad64e2bce Subject: Re: LF: Re: MiniWhip antenna, fiber optic TEST SIGNALS NEEDED on 630m WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2830 On 13-7-2013 14:28, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > .... > Due to the lower signal levels of the short active dipole i now > resonated the antenna to 630m, where i plan to do my tests. This > prevents IM and causes a significant gain! > ..... Assume the whip itself is tuned and not the longwire TX antenna next to it :-) Do you see a difference in signal when you ground your TX antenna versus fully tuned on MF? In other words does the TX antenna has any coupling to the MW. Jan/pa3abk -- pa3abk <-> dordrecht jo21it