Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.57.9 with SMTP id e9csp122350igq; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:08:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.96.227 with SMTP id dv3mr612355wib.59.1372198137034; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com ([195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t9si1912366wiv.63.2013.06.25.15.08.56 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: temperror (google.com: error in processing during lookup of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org: DNS timeout) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=temperror (google.com: error in processing during lookup of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org: DNS timeout) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UraBm-0004i5-PH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:50:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UraBm-0004hw-1m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:50:10 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UraBk-0005q8-8Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:50:08 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYBAGYBylECZMMu/2dsb2JhbAANSgOMZbNhgnaBHIMXAQEBAQOBCQsJDwkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBsDuSI481FxEFg00Dl0OSdoFf X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,939,1363132800"; d="scan'208,217";a="579768561" Received: from host-2-100-195-46.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.195.46]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2013 21:50:06 +0100 Message-ID: <51CA027E.4040308@psk31.plus.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:50:06 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <003d01ce71b1$fc0c55e0$f42501a0$@comcast.net> <51C9B3DE.6070603@psk31.plus.com> <51C9D009.6030802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51C9F5E2.5020507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <51C9F5E2.5020507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130625-0, 25/06/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan Did you look to see if your feeder had taken one hour to melt? :-) You know that WSPR's auto reporting is of no use at all and the quick QSO Mode 599 imi 599 is the preferred method. 73 Eddie [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 92b6515a4252c45136e975e6745a1e0d Subject: Re: LF: MF propagation Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080909020105010507060309" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2436 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080909020105010507060309 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Stefan Did you look to see if your feeder had taken one hour to melt? :-) You know that WSPR's auto reporting is of no use at all and the quick QSO Mode 599 imi 599 is the preferred method. 73 Eddie On 25/06/2013 20:56, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > MF, > > I just saw this: > Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az > 2013-06-25 19:48 DK7FC 0.475690 0 -1 JN49ik 1 IW4DXW > JN64bw 563 151 > 2013-06-25 19:42 DK7FC 0.475689 -2 0 JN49ik 1 IW4DXW > JN64bw 563 151 > 2013-06-25 19:36 DK7FC 0.475690 -2 0 JN49ik 1 IW4DXW > JN64bw 563 151 > 2013-06-25 19:24 DK7FC 0.475690 -8 -1 JN49ik 1 IW4DXW > JN64bw 563 151 > 2013-06-25 19:18 DK7FC 0.475690 -8 0 JN49ik 1 IW4DXW > JN64bw 563 151 > 2013-06-25 19:12 DK7FC 0.475690 -9 0 JN49ik 1 IW4DXW > JN64bw 563 151 > 2013-06-25 19:00 DK7FC 0.475690 -17 0 JN49ik 1 IW4DXW > JN64bw 563 151 > 2013-06-25 18:54 DK7FC 0.475689 -23 0 JN49ik 1 IW4DXW > JN64bw 563 151 > > > I find it interesting to see that the propagation on 630m between JN49 > and JN64, just 563 km, changed so rapidly and consistant from a > non-decode to an SNR of 0 dB, i.e. by about 30 dB in one hour! > > At EA2HB we can see now daily when the band opens from DL to EA and > when it closes. A really useful software! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------080909020105010507060309 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Stefan

Did you look to see if your feeder had taken one hour to melt? :-)
You know that WSPR's auto reporting is of no use at all and the quick QSO Mode 599 imi 599 is the preferred method.

73 Eddie

On 25/06/2013 20:56, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
MF,

I just saw this:
Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
 2013-06-25 19:48   DK7FC   0.475690   0   -1   JN49ik   1   IW4DXW   JN64bw   563   151 
 2013-06-25 19:42   DK7FC   0.475689   -2   0   JN49ik   1   IW4DXW   JN64bw   563   151 
 2013-06-25 19:36   DK7FC   0.475690   -2   0   JN49ik   1   IW4DXW   JN64bw   563   151 
 2013-06-25 19:24   DK7FC   0.475690   -8   -1   JN49ik   1   IW4DXW   JN64bw   563   151 
 2013-06-25 19:18   DK7FC   0.475690   -8   0   JN49ik   1   IW4DXW   JN64bw   563   151 
 2013-06-25 19:12   DK7FC   0.475690   -9   0   JN49ik   1   IW4DXW   JN64bw   563   151 
 2013-06-25 19:00   DK7FC   0.475690   -17   0   JN49ik   1   IW4DXW   JN64bw   563   151 
 2013-06-25 18:54   DK7FC   0.475689   -23   0   JN49ik   1   IW4DXW   JN64bw   563   151

I find it interesting to see that the propagation on 630m between JN49 and JN64, just 563 km, changed so rapidly and consistant from a non-decode to an SNR of 0 dB, i.e. by about 30 dB in one hour!

At EA2HB we can see now daily when the band opens from DL to EA and when it closes. A really useful software!

73, Stefan/DK7FC

--------------080909020105010507060309--