Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by mtain-mp01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CEBB5380000B9;
Fri, 7 Jun 2013 07:43:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1Ukv2t-0004Z4-R2
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:41:27 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1Ukv2t-0004Yv-1T
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:41:27 +0100
Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-4.server.virginmedia.net ([80.0.253.68])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com>)
id 1Ukv2o-0000Kg-6G
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:41:25 +0100
Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([82.5.252.56])
by know-smtprelay-4-imp with bizsmtp
id lPhM1l0051Dm6oq01PhMl7; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:41:21 +0100
X-Originating-IP: [82.5.252.56]
X-Spam: 0
X-Authority: v=2.0 cv=aMyoMsBm c=1 sm=1 a=LYFMc6Rxt/hR+Y+cXbZ2tQ==:17
a=uObrxnre4hsA:10 a=9YlaCzn6_68A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8
a=m_H_VvvXq0gA:10 a=giydrZjGAAAA:8 a=iAZsN8i0f6n7HZIFEc0A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
a=LYFMc6Rxt/hR+Y+cXbZ2tQ==:117
From: "Mike Dennison" <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:41:18 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <51B1D4EE.10369.A141CC@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>
In-reply-to: <n02tkjj9gb9042xpeli3c2ni.1370585824625@email.android.com>
References: <n02tkjj9gb9042xpeli3c2ni.1370585824625@email.android.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41)
Content-description: Mail message body
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: I will be calling you again this afternoon. Mike, G3XDV ===========
> Are there further stations qrv on lf for a cw QSO? > > 73, df5qg > > Christian
Groeger > > Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> schrieb:
> > >Hello Chris, Tom, > > > >Argh, i missed the session! I would like to
try a QSO with you Tom. > >Didn't know that you are QRV on 2200m. Your signal
on 630m was very > >clear :-) What is your rig on LF? Or do you prefer to
tell me that in > >the QSO? :-)Maybe better. > > > >Can we make a sked for
tomorrow or the weekend? I assume you will > >hear me! BTW SM6BGP will be
there soon too. > > > >73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > >PS: Chris, we should try a
5 way group QSO: DF5QG, DF6NM, DK7FC, > >DK1IS, SM6BGP > > > >Am 06.06.2013
16:19, schrieb DK1IS: > >> Am 06.06.2013 14:56, schrieb C. Groeger: > >>>
Hi, > >>> I'm testing now on 136.5 kHz. > >>> Reports are welcome;-) > >>>
Will call cq at 13.30 in cw > >>> > >>> 73, df5qg > >>> > >>> Christian Groeger
> >> Hello Chris, > >> > >> thanks for CW-QSO at 1350 UTC on 136,5 kHz! Ur
sigs 459-559 in > >> spite of bad QRN - thunderstorm is coming. Not the best
time for > >> aural QSOs on LF, hi! TX hr 750 W RF to a top loaded Marconi,
13 m > >> up, 4x30 m top load, ant current 5 A at 30 Ohm. RX remote Perseus
> >> in JN59VK with ALA ant. My loc is JN59WK, city of Amberg. > >> > >>
Hope to meet you again with less QRN! > >> > >> 73, > >> Tom, DK1IS > >> JN59WK
> >> www.qrz.com/db/dk1is > >> > > [...]
Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Scan-Signature: c9d6a1e47761f7ec7375ac340bef30d0
Subject: Re: LF: Df5qg on 136.5
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14551b1c7614392
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none
I will be calling you again this afternoon.
Mike, G3XDV
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Are there further stations qrv on lf for a cw QSO?
>
> 73, df5qg
>
> Christian Groeger
>
> Stefan Sch=E4fer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> schrieb:
>
> >Hello Chris, Tom,
> >
> >Argh, i missed the session! I would like to try a QSO with you Tom.
> >Didn't know that you are QRV on 2200m. Your signal on 630m was very
> >clear :-) What is your rig on LF? Or do you prefer to tell me that in
> >the QSO? :-)Maybe better.
> >
> >Can we make a sked for tomorrow or the weekend? I assume you will
> >hear me! BTW SM6BGP will be there soon too.
> >
> >73, Stefan/DK7FC
> >
> >PS: Chris, we should try a 5 way group QSO: DF5QG, DF6NM, DK7FC,
> >DK1IS, SM6BGP
> >
> >Am 06.06.2013 16:19, schrieb DK1IS:
> >> Am 06.06.2013 14:56, schrieb C. Groeger:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I'm testing now on 136.5 kHz.
> >>> Reports are welcome;-)
> >>> Will call cq at 13.30 in cw
> >>>
> >>> 73, df5qg
> >>>
> >>> Christian Groeger
> >> Hello Chris,
> >>
> >> thanks for CW-QSO at 1350 UTC on 136,5 kHz! Ur sigs 459-559 in
> >> spite of bad QRN - thunderstorm is coming. Not the best time for
> >> aural QSOs on LF, hi! TX hr 750 W RF to a top loaded Marconi, 13 m
> >> up, 4x30 m top load, ant current 5 A at 30 Ohm. RX remote Perseus
> >> in JN59VK with ALA ant. My loc is JN59WK, city of Amberg.
> >>
> >> Hope to meet you again with less QRN!
> >>
> >> 73,
> >> Tom, DK1IS
> >> JN59WK
> >> www.qrz.com/db/dk1is
> >>
> >