Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C5DBD380000B2; Tue, 28 May 2013 18:54:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UhSla-0001av-8n for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 23:53:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UhSlZ-0001am-Sr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 23:53:17 +0100 Received: from mta11.charter.net ([216.33.127.80]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UhSlT-0005nS-Uj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 23:53:16 +0100 Received: from imp11 ([10.20.200.11]) by mta11.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP id <20130528225249.OHSF6169.mta11.charter.net@imp11> for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 18:52:49 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.143] ([75.130.249.69]) by imp11 with smtp.charter.net id hasp1l00L1Wb5Uj05aspbk; Tue, 28 May 2013 18:52:49 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=dIr+A5lb c=1 sm=1 a=5hGFLARdMX34Lrtx4DhkEA==:17 a=nzesPlDgKGEA:10 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=W_TztANd15kA:10 a=fgmQF91XrPSOAyOHEb4A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=5hGFLARdMX34Lrtx4DhkEA==:117 Message-ID: <51A53702.8020300@charter.net> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 19:00:18 -0400 From: John Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51A3DE4E.20904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51A49A29.1010803@charter.net> <51A52DF6.3070300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <51A52DF6.3070300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, > The image looks smoothed. Is there such a function enabled? Not intentionally. I did have the AGC running on the receiver, as the noise crashes were fairly loud. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [216.33.127.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 925300287489a1d7272e62b121c112aa Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d605751a5359a635b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan, > The image looks smoothed. Is there such a function enabled? Not intentionally. I did have the AGC running on the receiver, as the noise crashes were fairly loud. > I will continue now. Will watch again tonight. John, W1TAG