Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0AEA33800008E; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:18:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UN7eB-0002K4-Gg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:17:35 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UN7eB-0002Jv-4u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:17:35 +0100 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UN7e9-0004Ei-Jd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:17:34 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai8DAHk7W1FOlm4t/2dsb2JhbAANNrwhhBSEB4NSZRgWGAMCAQIBWAgBAbZggzGQDI82gyoDlmuSOoFd X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,394,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="424562327" Received: from host-78-150-110-45.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([78.150.110.45]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 02 Apr 2013 21:17:12 +0100 Message-ID: <515B3CC7.6020905@psk31.plus.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:17:11 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130402-0, 02/04/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The RaspberryPi is quite stable and capable of good WSPR15 performance. Colin G6AVK produced no Spots of my 5uW of WSPR2. So we tried WSPR15, like you do. 2013-04-02 19:45 G3ZJO 0.475814 -32 0 IO92ng +0 0.001 G6AVK JO01ho 127 79 [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: LF: WSPR15 from the RasPi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b96515b3d2754b4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none The RaspberryPi is quite stable and capable of good WSPR15 performance. Colin G6AVK produced no Spots of my 5uW of WSPR2. So we tried WSPR15, like you do. 2013-04-02 19:45 G3ZJO 0.475814 -32 0 IO92ng +0 0.001 G6AVK JO01ho 127 79 So hey there is a use on MF for WSPR15, extending the capability of a steady path where the signal level is too low. Logical.:-) 73 Eddie G3ZJO