Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3FC73380000B0; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:39:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UJ3U6-0001Qg-Eq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:02:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UJ3U5-0001QX-OS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:02:21 +0000 Received: from out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ3U2-00017Z-UH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:02:20 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApQBACtmTFFOlm1f/2dsb2JhbAANNoQZgTbAAIF5gxgBAQEBA0k8BAsJCAQBAQEIARYIBwkDAgECARQgCQgTBQECAQGHfgMWBa8NiTUaiTcXjmIlEQEGgzoDlmSLbIgi X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,891,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="66673210" Received: from host-78-150-109-95.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([78.150.109.95]) by out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2013 15:01:57 +0000 Message-ID: <514C7264.8020501@psk31.plus.com> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:01:56 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <62fc65b613494309a1b2b0d0f45500db@kabelmail.de> In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130322-0, 22/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Uwe Looking good in the UK today too. http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 783e848a630124d13ae6ef06c152f951 Subject: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070607020400010606060908" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4081514c7b2b59d9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070607020400010606060908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Uwe Looking good in the UK today too. http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 22/03/2013 09:16, PA1SDB, Peter wrote: > Uwe, > Looks stable and very strong over the night. > That step in my 238 uHz window is because DHO went QRT for 1h. > I use DHO 23.4 KHz experimental as reference in only this 238 uHz window. > At 09h UTC today I did switch back to 22k1 as reference for Specrum Lab. > At 06h30 was your signal very strong today. > The cursor say's -116dB at that moment. > Where do I read the noise floor in Spectrum Lab ? > Average of the Yellow grab ? > In that case Noise is -140dB > Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB > www.qsl.net/pa1sdb > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* PA1SDB, Peter > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:24 PM > *Subject:* Re: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ > 0.001 Hz) > > Hi Uwe, > Between ~11 and ~16 h UTC today was stabillity perfect. > Befor 11 was a short break and also after 16 h > Not sure how it is right now. > The new traces are building slowly and the picture is not complete > yet. > 73's, Peter. > PA1SDB > www.qsl.net/pa1sdb > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de > > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:23 PM > *Subject:* Re: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ > 0.001 Hz) > > Hi Peter and Eddie, > > thanks for the hint. > > GL > Uwe/dj8wx > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Gesendet: 20.03.2013 11:07 > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Betreff: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Hi Peter / Uwe > > Maybe that explains why when I ran my my Grabber yesterday I > could detect nothing. I haven't been running any 8.9KHz for a > while as my WSPR on 474KHz makes a mess. > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO > > On 20/03/2013 06:28, PA1SDB, Peter wrote: >> Hello Uwe, >> Your signal is not very stable now. >> www.qsl.net/pa1sdb >> It feels not good to me to complain about 0.001 Hz drift, >> but I hope you understand when you take a look at my grabber ;-) >> Thanks anyway for all the experimental broadcast's. >> Best 73's, Peter - PA1SDB > --------------070607020400010606060908 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Uwe

Looking good in the UK today too.

http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm

73 Eddie G3ZJO

On 22/03/2013 09:16, PA1SDB, Peter wrote:
Uwe,
Looks stable and very strong over the night.
That step in my 238 uHz window is because DHO went QRT for 1h.
I use DHO 23.4 KHz experimental as reference in only this 238 uHz window.
At 09h UTC today I did switch back to 22k1 as reference for Specrum Lab.
 
At 06h30 was your signal very strong today.
The cursor say's -116dB at that moment.
 
Where do I read the noise floor in Spectrum Lab ?
Average of the Yellow grab ?
In that case Noise is -140dB
 
Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz)

Hi Uwe,
Between ~11 and ~16 h UTC today was stabillity perfect.
Befor 11 was a short break and also after 16 h
Not sure how it is right now.
The new traces are building slowly and the picture is not complete yet.
 
73's, Peter.
 
PA1SDB
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz)

Hi Peter and Eddie,

thanks for the hint.

GL
Uwe/dj8wx
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Gesendet: 20.03.2013 11:07
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz)

Hi Peter / Uwe

Maybe that explains why when I ran my my Grabber yesterday I could detect nothing. I haven't been running any 8.9KHz for a while as my WSPR on 474KHz makes a mess.

73 Eddie G3ZJO

On 20/03/2013 06:28, PA1SDB, Peter wrote:
Hello Uwe,
Your signal is not very stable now.
 
 
It feels not good to me to complain about 0.001 Hz drift, but I hope you understand when you take a look at my grabber ;-)
 
Thanks anyway for all the experimental broadcast's.
 
 
 
Best 73's, Peter - PA1SDB 
 
 
 


--------------070607020400010606060908--