Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6647438000085; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:39:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UIP5f-0006Ds-Ax for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:54:27 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UIP5e-0006Dj-Ut for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:54:26 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UIP5d-0003Je-7a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:54:25 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjcDAJ0FSlFOlmIn/2dsb2JhbAANN8UaBAMBgWiDGAEBAQEDOFEUDwkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBiByvF5M+jxYWgyoDlmCBH5Jt X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,880,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="422961840" Received: from host-78-150-98-39.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([78.150.98.39]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 20 Mar 2013 19:54:04 +0000 Message-ID: <514A13DA.1020909@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:54:02 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51488378.7030901@princeton.edu> <5148C475.8020502@broadpark.no> <5149F751.6040300@psk31.plus.com> <375052BE7FCC411B8923E3CE33F1BE53@GaryAsus> <514A0CC4.7050601@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <514A0CC4.7050601@psk31.plus.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130320-0, 20/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: It is probably a false positive. I am not sure I would have allowed it though if I was given the chance. http://blog.teesupport.com/how-to-remove-win32evo-gen-susp-virus-effectively-guide/ Eddie [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 0a4643e586472c13187d293ec5d096c2 Subject: LF: WSPR-X v0.8 r3058 - blocked due to win32evo-gen-susp-virus Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=REMOVE_PAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad3514a1e76755a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none It is probably a false positive. I am not sure I would have allowed it though if I was given the chance. http://blog.teesupport.com/how-to-remove-win32evo-gen-susp-virus-effectively-guide/ Eddie On 20/03/2013 19:23, g3zjo wrote: > Hi Gary > > Thanks, I didn't get the chance to give it permission it has been > blocked. > > Have you noticed V.0.8 has a Hash File is this a 'deep decode', 'cheat > file' like some WSJT moon modes have. > > Eddie > > On 20/03/2013 19:12, Gary - G4WGT wrote: >> Hi Eddie, >> >> Yes, on installation I got a "Suspicuous File" message today >> (F-Secure) but was OK when I gave the security software the "OK" to >> continue. >> >> 73, Gary - G4WGT.