Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EEFF8380000AB; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:54:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UGFjY-0004wZ-OX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:30:44 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UGFjY-0004wQ-7Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:30:44 +0000 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UGFjW-0003Yl-OK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:30:43 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAOsvQlFcEF8c/2dsb2JhbAANNsIkgl6Be4MfAQEBAQM4UQsJDwkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBtlOTPY8dFoMqA5ZYlAw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,846,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="568961377" Received: from host-92-16-95-28.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.16.95.28]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2013 21:30:21 +0000 Message-ID: <5142416A.2040101@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:30:18 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1759283.u8NeRiNtsT@fbox.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1759283.u8NeRiNtsT@fbox.localdomain> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130314-1, 14/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Colin That is pretty good over the distance involved.There must be many more stations in ear shot too. Without documentation from JE3HHT we can't be sure of his implementation of GMSK but I think there is no FEC used. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: Re: LF: GMSK report Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600c5142471d686b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks Colin That is pretty good over the distance involved.There must be many more stations in ear shot too. Without documentation from JE3HHT we can't be sure of his implementation of GMSK but I think there is no FEC used. The Beacon timer dropped out at 20.30 ish and I left it off. 73 Eddie On 14/03/2013 21:09, Colin J Thomson wrote: > Hi Eddie, LF, > > This was about the best seen of you tonight. My noise level is a little high > as usual at this time of day and makes copy difficult. > > 73 Colin - G6AVK