Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 01263380000F2; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:30:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UF5Fw-0007Rt-Cq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:07:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UF5Fw-0007Rk-0H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:07:20 +0000 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UF5Fu-0004tV-I4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:07:18 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAGwAPlFcGSHn/2dsb2JhbAANNsFygmGBb4MdAQEBAQM4UQsJDwkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBsXGTKo8VFoMqA5ZVk38 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,824,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="416995660" Received: from host-92-25-33-231.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.25.33.231]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2013 16:06:57 +0000 Message-ID: <513E011F.9090709@psk31.plus.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:06:55 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <513DFA46.1030307@eastlink.ca> In-Reply-To: <513DFA46.1030307@eastlink.ca> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130311-0, 11/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Superb Vern Tobias DG3LV is testing using both modes at times and has promised more test this week I think. (Well that has put him on a spot now anyway). I shall watch your results with interest. No, no special settings, any WSPR15 signals will appear in its own waterfall. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: b77892ad90d0261eaf071f4f6cf31464 Subject: Re: LF: 475 khz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6018513e06ba7080 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Superb Vern Tobias DG3LV is testing using both modes at times and has promised more test this week I think. (Well that has put him on a spot now anyway). I shall watch your results with interest. No, no special settings, any WSPR15 signals will appear in its own waterfall. P.S How do you like WSPR as a real living breathing program rather than a dead box. 73 Eddie On 11/03/2013 15:37, Vernon wrote: > Hi all, > > Will run 2 instances of WSPR this evening and over night...WSPR 2 and > WSPR 15 ( thanks to Eddie ) > > Not sure how all will pan out ?? > > Dial here will be at 474.200 > > If there is anything that I should know about WSPR 15 other than > downloading it and firing it up...like special settings etc....please > let me know. > > Vernon - VE1VDM > >