Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4342138000096; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 06:14:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UEHix-0007vO-NQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:13:59 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UEHix-0007vF-7A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:13:59 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UEHiv-0004cO-2l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:13:58 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUDAOoKO1ECZMFo/2dsb2JhbAANNoQaiWu2WAQBgXWDIAEBAQEDgQkLCQgEAQEBCRYPCQMCAQIBPQgTBgIBAYd9AxuoFZMajESBFyt7EoNAA5R4gVyLWogjgXI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,813,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="411414483" Received: from host-2-100-193-104.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.193.104]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2013 11:13:35 +0000 Message-ID: <513B195E.9070007@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:13:34 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1362821405.92134.YahooMailNeo@web171606.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <513B06F3.1000304@psk31.plus.com> <1362826484.10925.YahooMailNeo@web171604.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1362826484.10925.YahooMailNeo@web171604.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130308-1, 08/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Chris Anything strong in the 2.5KHz pass band will naturally de sense the RX. The test wasn't long enough to be sure about the effects, (Graham was asking the other day) it seemed to have little effect on stronger signals but those nearer the noise floor seemed to go down 6dB on the WSRP report. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: c7a664e36c9ca637ce420897bb72a08a Subject: Re: LF: MF - Activity & Beacon - G3XIZ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020109070101030802020703" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6189513b19a86bd4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020109070101030802020703 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks Chris Anything strong in the 2.5KHz pass band will naturally de sense the RX. The test wasn't long enough to be sure about the effects, (Graham was asking the other day) it seemed to have little effect on stronger signals but those nearer the noise floor seemed to go down 6dB on the WSRP report. 73 Eddie On 09/03/2013 10:54, Chris Osborn wrote: > Thanks Eddie, > > My apologies and now QSY'd to 473.6 kHz > > 73 > Chris G3XIZ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* g3zjo > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Cc:* Chris Osborn > *Sent:* Saturday, 9 March 2013, 9:54 > *Subject:* Re: LF: MF - Activity & Beacon - G3XIZ > > Hi Chris > > Superb signal. > > There is a big problem with close powerful stations on this band, you > have completely blacked out my Grabber > http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/lfgrabber.html > > Interesting experiment to see what difference it makes to S/N levels > on WSPR here. > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO > > On 09/03/2013 09:30, Chris Osborn wrote: >> MF >> >> I've had some good QSO's on MF this past week: >> >> EI6DN >> GI3PDN >> OK2BVG >> GW3OQK >> M0JXM >> DF5QG >> PA0LCE >> DK3WX >> M0FMT >> GM3YXM/A >> PA0HTT >> G0MIN >> >> Unfortunately CW activity during daylight hours seems quite sparse, >> even at weekends. >> Should anyone (in range) wish to check their receivers then I shall >> be transmitting a QRP beacon on 475.2 kHz for several hours today. >> ERP is about 100 mW >> >> I am available for skeds at weekends but please give a little notice >> via E-mail. >> >> 73 >> Chris >> G3XIZ >> >> >> > > > --------------020109070101030802020703 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks Chris

Anything strong in the 2.5KHz pass band will naturally de sense the RX.
The test wasn't long enough to be sure about the effects, (Graham was asking the other day) it seemed to have little effect on stronger signals but those nearer the noise floor seemed to go down 6dB on the WSRP report.

73 Eddie

On 09/03/2013 10:54, Chris Osborn wrote:
Thanks Eddie,

My apologies and now QSY'd to 473.6 kHz

73
Chris G3XIZ


From: g3zjo <g3zjo@psk31.plus.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Cc: Chris Osborn <g3xiz@yahoo.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, 9 March 2013, 9:54
Subject: Re: LF: MF - Activity & Beacon - G3XIZ

Hi Chris

Superb signal.

There is a big problem with close powerful stations on this band, you have completely blacked out my Grabber
http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/lfgrabber.html

Interesting experiment to see what difference it makes to S/N levels on WSPR here.

73 Eddie G3ZJO

On 09/03/2013 09:30, Chris Osborn wrote:
MF

I've had some good QSO's on MF this past week:

EI6DN
GI3PDN
OK2BVG
GW3OQK
M0JXM
DF5QG
PA0LCE
DK3WX
M0FMT
GM3YXM/A
PA0HTT
G0MIN

Unfortunately CW activity during daylight hours seems quite sparse, even at weekends.
Should anyone (in range) wish to check their receivers then I shall  be transmitting a QRP beacon on 475.2 kHz for several hours today.
ERP is about 100 mW

I am available for skeds at weekends but please give a little notice via E-mail.

73
Chris
G3XIZ







--------------020109070101030802020703--