Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4D1E1380000EF; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 17:41:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UE5xe-0003nv-3U for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:40:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UE5xd-0003nm-Gs for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:40:21 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UE5xb-0002wr-8b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:40:20 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBANhXOlFcEW1//2dsb2JhbAANNsRQgXODIAEBAQEDOFELCQgEAQEBCRYPCQMCAQIBPQgTBgIBAbBwkyaPARIGEIMqA5ZTk3w X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,810,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="421019588" Received: from host-92-17-109-127.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.17.109.127]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2013 22:39:58 +0000 Message-ID: <513A68BE.3000706@psk31.plus.com> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:39:58 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <513A59B1.4010704@psk31.plus.com> <3B98DD89AAE54F03A77870996396B316@AGB> In-Reply-To: <3B98DD89AAE54F03A77870996396B316@AGB> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130308-0, 08/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi G Just wondering if its possibly an error message, I can't remember where I have seen it before certainly not MF. Ironic, its the first unsolicited recognition of my signal on 600 / 630m, other than WSPR and Opera modes, which I always say the reporter has no choice. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 64437c466041e93ffedda7fb96b22b71 Subject: Re: LF: Oh Dear Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4086513a690f6684 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi G Just wondering if its possibly an error message, I can't remember where I have seen it before certainly not MF. Ironic, its the first unsolicited recognition of my signal on 600 / 630m, other than WSPR and Opera modes, which I always say the reporter has no choice. Seems the ideal mode for QRP 2 Way. Personally I would park it just above WSPR15. What do you say about PK31 with a Class D PA? Ed On 08/03/2013 22:10, Graham wrote: > Thats handy Ed , Its raining up here , was wondering where > the moon was : ) > > what is not the wrong mode then ? > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "g3zjo" > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 9:35 PM > To: > Subject: LF: Oh Dear > >> We are starting this are we.? The frequency has been clear for days so >> you do a test QRP test and you get this. Who says? >> >> Was the QRSS Morse that was ignored this afternoon the wrong mode? >> >> G3ZJO >> > >