Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 22E67380000AC; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 16:39:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UCGcT-00037w-Mr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:38:57 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UCGcT-00037n-7D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:38:57 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UCGcQ-00084e-Ru for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:38:56 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAMTAM1FcGSfH/2dsb2JhbAANOMJKgRSDEgEBAQECAX4HBAsJCAQBAQEJFggHCQMCAQIBNAkIEwYCAQGICRK0Y5IkjxIRAQYQgyoDlkaBHpJW X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,774,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="420378523" Received: from host-92-25-39-199.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.25.39.199]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2013 21:38:32 +0000 Message-ID: <5133C2D8.9090801@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:38:32 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <58DDEF66BD1F4FCDA781E159BB3130D4@GaryAsus> <51337C35.60707@psk31.plus.com> <0C37897B99BA4C249263E02AA5ED9DF1@GaryAsus> <51339A30.5000504@psk31.plus.com> <1362336574.71312.YahooMailNeo@web133205.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <8BB188A36149420181C1309CCE574E10@GaryAsus> <5133A4EC.70002@psk31.plus.com> <5133AA76.7070307@psk31.plus.com> <60307476B965438A911887A1D8338951@GaryAsus> In-Reply-To: <60307476B965438A911887A1D8338951@GaryAsus> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130303-0, 03/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 03/03/2013 20:14, Gary - G4WGT wrote: > Eddie, > Yes the interference is dreadful. I did try after the severe stuff had gone. > RTTY will need to be a great deal stronger than WSPR for a decode. Well that is a broad statement. WSPR is often good clean steady and visible which may well produce results, I have seen my WSPR good clean and steady on your Grabber. I measured G6AVK's steady signal the other day, he was -11dB reported on WSPR, that signal was +20dB / Averaged Noise in a 2.5KHz bandwidth on SpecLab. One sounds unlikely for QSO modes, the other possible, like 100% copy on CMSK8 which we did. We shall have to try RTTY on that one. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f45514038df04b1035abb1d5446da941 Subject: Re: LF: RTTY tonight. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030601090303010001070905" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b9a5133c32674d1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030601090303010001070905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/03/2013 20:14, Gary - G4WGT wrote: > Eddie, > Yes the interference is dreadful. I did try after the severe stuff had gone. > RTTY will need to be a great deal stronger than WSPR for a decode. Well that is a broad statement. WSPR is often good clean steady and visible which may well produce results, I have seen my WSPR good clean and steady on your Grabber. I measured G6AVK's steady signal the other day, he was -11dB reported on WSPR, that signal was +20dB / Averaged Noise in a 2.5KHz bandwidth on SpecLab. One sounds unlikely for QSO modes, the other possible, like 100% copy on CMSK8 which we did. We shall have to try RTTY on that one. G's Mind Games. 73 Eddie. > 73, Gary. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* g3zjo > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Sunday, March 03, 2013 7:54 PM > *Subject:* Re: LF: RTTY tonight. > > Yes not a lot of hope of much getting through that mess. > > I do see my WSPR on your Grabber and you were reporting -9dB > yesterday. > > Same QRP here as on WSPR, 10W of RF 5mW ERP from my small Marconi. > > Eddie > > On 03/03/2013 19:44, Gary - G4WGT wrote: >> Hi Eddie, >> Sorry nothing seen from you, what are your Tx conditions ?? >> I do get a lot of intermittent RF type interference & is there at >> the moment.....see my grabber at :- >> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/grabber2.html >> 73, Gary - G4WGT. >> > --------------030601090303010001070905 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/03/2013 20:14, Gary - G4WGT wrote:
Eddie,
 
Yes the interference is dreadful.
I did try after the severe stuff had gone.
 
RTTY will need to be a great deal stronger than WSPR for a decode.
Well  that is a broad statement.
WSPR is often good clean steady and visible which may well produce results, I have seen my WSPR good clean and steady on your Grabber.
I measured G6AVK's steady signal the other day, he was -11dB reported on WSPR, that signal was +20dB / Averaged Noise in a 2.5KHz bandwidth on SpecLab. One sounds unlikely for QSO modes, the other possible, like 100% copy on CMSK8 which we did. We shall have to try RTTY on that one.

G's Mind Games.

73 Eddie.

 
73, Gary.
----- Original Message -----
From: g3zjo
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: LF: RTTY tonight.

Yes not a lot of hope of much getting through that mess.

I do see my WSPR on your Grabber and you were reporting -9dB yesterday.

Same QRP here as on WSPR, 10W of RF 5mW ERP from my small Marconi.

Eddie

On 03/03/2013 19:44, Gary - G4WGT wrote:
Hi Eddie,
 
Sorry nothing seen from you, what are your Tx conditions ??
 
I do get a lot of intermittent RF type interference & is there at the moment.....see my grabber at :-
 
 
73, Gary - G4WGT.
 



--------------030601090303010001070905--