Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0BA82380000A0; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 10:40:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UBo9N-0003Cw-5c for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:15:01 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UBo9M-0003Cl-JM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:15:00 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UBo9K-0001nj-TP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:14:59 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvwCAP36MVFcGSDU/2dsb2JhbAANN7tUiAWDUWUYFhgDAgECAVgIAQG3SZMAjzqDKgOWRpN0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,767,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="420861294" Received: from host-92-25-32-212.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.25.32.212]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2013 15:14:37 +0000 Message-ID: <5132175E.9050307@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:14:38 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130302-0, 02/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: LF Testing CMSK8 on 475.200KHz. Why has this keyboard QSO mode been ignored. 12.5Hz wide an suitable for a Quality commercial HF driver TX. With JT9-2 the drift of a Quality HF rig precludes its use and there is nothing to be done after a NO DECODE. The same drift with CMSK8 is inconsequential but can be fine tuned during RX. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558 Subject: LF: Testing CMSK8 630m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d751321d556e7d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror LF Testing CMSK8 on 475.200KHz. Why has this keyboard QSO mode been ignored. 12.5Hz wide an suitable for a Quality commercial HF driver TX. With JT9-2 the drift of a Quality HF rig precludes its use and there is nothing to be done after a NO DECODE. The same drift with CMSK8 is inconsequential but can be fine tuned during RX. 73 Eddie G3ZJO