Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 89FE238000092; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 09:55:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UBnRH-00033l-E1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 14:29:27 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.34] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UBnRG-00033c-SI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 14:29:26 +0000 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnRE-0003fZ-MQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 14:29:25 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBALwKMlFcGSDU/2dsb2JhbAANN8JHgRKDEgEBAQEDgQUECwkIBAEBAQkWCAcJAwIBAgE0CQgTBgIBAYd9A69GiTsLD4kjjVyBNhEBBoM6A5ZGi1eIHYFy X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,767,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="567526581" Received: from host-92-25-32-212.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.25.32.212]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2013 14:24:02 +0000 Message-ID: <51320B82.3060003@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 14:24:02 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <165DFADF844B423F946979B86DCA56C7@AGB> <0CE08C640EDA48DD97E19B143502C364@AGB> <48FA9DB8022543919A9F05049D7C7CFE@AGB> <5131F2F3.9000909@psk31.plus.com> <8DB38417EF17436ABC682105C8682500@AGB> <5131FF90.2010309@psk31.plus.com> <12A567D59678436893BDFB292AB944C5@AGB> In-Reply-To: <12A567D59678436893BDFB292AB944C5@AGB> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130302-0, 02/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay2.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: You are missing a Zero G, -30dB Take a look here http://www.qsl.net/g6avk/ I will paint you some lines at 475.210KHz Ed [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: da503d40de1d15ba476c143c8a26a457 Subject: Re: LF: rtty 478 ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030907030807000903020201" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600e513212c63b93 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030907030807000903020201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You are missing a Zero G, -30dB Take a look here http://www.qsl.net/g6avk/ I will paint you some lines at 475.210KHz Ed On 02/03/2013 13:39, Graham wrote: > Is that at the - 3dB points ? > > *From:* g3zjo > *Sent:* Saturday, March 02, 2013 1:33 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: rtty 478 ? > > 12.5 Hz is WIDE.? > > Ed > > On 02/03/2013 13:28, Graham wrote: >> Taking a walk on the wide side Ed ? >> G.. >> >> *From:* g3zjo >> *Sent:* Saturday, March 02, 2013 12:39 PM >> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> *Subject:* Re: LF: rtty 478 ? >> >> What about CMSK8, currently testing on 475.210, its not crowded there >> but may move up later to 478.100. >> >> Slightly Critical tuning takes operator skill should suit Mal. >> >> Ed >> >> On 01/03/2013 21:28, Graham wrote: >>> Stereo >>> Multi psk has 85 hz shift amtor - that was not there in >>> the good old days ? >>> that should work well ? >>> G. >>> >>> *From:* Gary - G4WGT >>> *Sent:* Friday, March 01, 2013 9:22 PM >>> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: LF: rtty 478 ? >>> >>> Hi Graham, LF, >>> Just testing tonight for some serious RTTY QSO attempts over weekend. >>> Thanks for your report & Well Done over 2 paths. >>> 73, >>> Gary - G4WGT. >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Graham >>> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> >>> *Sent:* Friday, March 01, 2013 9:06 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: LF: rtty 478 ? >>> >>> Via Tween WEB SDR >>> AJCSV UYRYRY RYRSRYRY TESTING DE G4WGT G4WGT - T83QO -KENWOOD >>> TS-440S "RACAL LINEAR AMPLIFIER - UPM CAL ANLENET- 100OW ERP 8 >>> RTTYREPLIEE AND E-MAIL REPORTS ARE WELCOME DE G4WGT K AK >>> >>> *From:* Graham >>> *Sent:* Friday, March 01, 2013 8:58 PM >>> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: LF: rtty 478 ? >>> >>> 478.2 mid tones 75 shift 45.45 baud >>> &)--"GQU"?96 TESTING DE G4WGT G4WGT - IO83QO -KENWOOD TS-440S " >>> RACAL LINEAR AMPLIFIER - 12M VERTICAL ANTENNA - 100MW ERP - RTTY >>> REPLIES AND E-MAIL REPORTS ARE WELCOME DE G4WGT K >>> >>> *From:* Graham >>> *Sent:* Friday, March 01, 2013 8:50 PM >>> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> >>> *Subject:* LF: rtty 478 ? >>> >>> rtty on 478 -- who ? >>> G. >>> >> > --------------030907030807000903020201 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You are missing a Zero G, -30dB

Take a look here http://www.qsl.net/g6avk/ I will paint you some lines at 475.210KHz

Ed

On 02/03/2013 13:39, Graham wrote:
Is  that  at the  - 3dB points ? 

From: g3zjo
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: LF: rtty 478 ?

12.5 Hz is WIDE.?

Ed

On 02/03/2013 13:28, Graham wrote:
Taking a  walk on the  wide  side  Ed ?
 
G..
 

From: g3zjo
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: LF: rtty 478 ?

What about CMSK8, currently testing on 475.210, its not crowded there but may move up later to 478.100.

Slightly Critical tuning takes operator skill should suit Mal.

Ed

On 01/03/2013 21:28, Graham wrote:
Stereo
 
Multi psk  has  85  hz  shift  amtor  - that  was not  there  in the  good  old  days  ?
 
that  should   work  well ?
 
G.
 

Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: LF: rtty 478 ?

Hi Graham, LF,
 
Just testing tonight for some serious RTTY QSO attempts over weekend.
 
Thanks for your report & Well Done over 2 paths.
 
73,
 
Gary - G4WGT.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Graham
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: LF: rtty 478 ?

Via Tween WEB SDR
 
AJCSV UYRYRY RYRSRYRY TESTING DE G4WGT G4WGT -  T83QO -KENWOOD TS-440S "RACAL LINEAR AMPLIFIER - UPM CAL ANLENET- 100OW ERP 8 RTTYREPLIEE AND E-MAIL REPORTS ARE WELCOME DE G4WGT    K AK
 
 

From: Graham
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: LF: rtty 478 ?

478.2  mid  tones    75 shift   45.45  baud
 
 
&)--"GQU"?96 TESTING DE G4WGT G4WGT - IO83QO -KENWOOD TS-440S " RACAL LINEAR AMPLIFIER - 12M VERTICAL ANTENNA - 100MW ERP - RTTY REPLIES AND E-MAIL REPORTS ARE WELCOME DE G4WGT    K

From: Graham
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 8:50 PM
Subject: LF: rtty 478 ?

rtty  on 478 --  who ?
 
 
 
G.



--------------030907030807000903020201--