Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E072238000084; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:37:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U7QfW-0003gt-Ax for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:22:06 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U7QfV-0003gk-RT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:22:05 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U7QfU-0000Aa-2G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:22:04 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYBALEqIlFOlm1u/2dsb2JhbAANOIwks32BGoMSAQEBAQOBBQQLCQgEAQEBCRYIBwkDAgECATQJCBMGAgEBtHKSd48sEQEGgzoDliyTXw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,687,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="419560359" Received: from host-78-150-109-110.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([78.150.109.110]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2013 13:21:41 +0000 Message-ID: <51222AE4.6020801@psk31.plus.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:21:40 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <00df01ce0dba$13ecb080$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <51220AE0.8060106@psk31.plus.com> <017e01ce0dd4$15c0fc80$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <017e01ce0dd4$15c0fc80$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130218-0, 18/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Here we go again twisting the facts, I have expressed no such concerns, you have. What world do you live in. CX4DVF has not been heard on WSPR on any band in the last 2 Weeks. Unless CX4DVF does not connect to the internet there has been no one on WSPR using that call on any band in the last 2 weeks. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 3547ef0bd9aa4f6a2596c8a6b1b20265 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR DX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070706020801010207080102" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14551222eb46a85 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070706020801010207080102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Here we go again twisting the facts, I have expressed no such concerns, you have. What world do you live in. CX4DVF has not been heard on WSPR on any band in the last 2 Weeks. Unless CX4DVF does not connect to the internet there has been no one on WSPR using that call on any band in the last 2 weeks. Can you produce the full details from your WSPR RX log.? Yawn. On 18/02/2013 12:32, mal hamilton wrote: > Eddie if you are so concerned about the validity of CX4DVF/Sandos > contact him and see if he was on air at the time specified > g3kev > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* g3zjo > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Monday, February 18, 2013 11:05 AM > *Subject:* Re: LF: WSPR DX > > Hi Mal > > On 18/02/2013 09:26, mal hamilton wrote: >> MF >> Some good DX about this past couple of days >> this morning >> 0916 -25 1.4 0.475745 2 CX4DVF 13 > Well at least the system wasn't stupid enough to think it was a > valid decode and add it to the database. > > There really aren't that many false decodes if the RX signal is > free of spurii. May be it was a mix of my enormous signal, you > received me at that time, with a sprog at your end. > > Or maybe you shouldn't be getting sarcastic maybe you should be > getting excited. VK2DAG transmitted at that time. > > More likely though with the coincidence of characters in the Call > and the QRG it could have been WG2XCT also co timed. > >> This must indeed be a MIRACLE mode > Its not doing bad at all lately is it. > > Eddie >> de G3KEV > --------------070706020801010207080102 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Here we go again twisting the facts, I have expressed no such concerns, you have.

What world do you live in. CX4DVF has not been heard on WSPR on any band in the last 2 Weeks.
Unless CX4DVF does not connect to the internet there has been no one on WSPR using that call on any band in the last 2 weeks.

Can you produce the full details from your WSPR RX log.?

Yawn.


On 18/02/2013 12:32, mal hamilton wrote:
Eddie if you are so concerned about the validity of CX4DVF/Sandos contact him and see if he was on air at the time specified
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From: g3zjo
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR DX

Hi Mal

On 18/02/2013 09:26, mal hamilton wrote:
MF
Some good DX about this past couple of days
this morning
0916 -25 1.4 0.475745 2 CX4DVF 13
Well at least the system wasn't stupid enough to think it was a valid decode and add it to the database.

There really aren't that many false decodes if the RX signal is free of spurii. May be it was a mix of my enormous signal, you received me at that time, with a sprog at your end.

Or maybe you shouldn't be getting sarcastic maybe you should be getting excited. VK2DAG transmitted at that time.

More likely though with the coincidence of characters in the  Call and the QRG it could have been WG2XCT also co timed.

 
This must indeed be a MIRACLE mode
 
Its not doing bad at all lately is it.

Eddie
de G3KEV
 


--------------070706020801010207080102--