Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7E6373800009E; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:26:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TrqEB-0006CB-9w for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:25:27 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TrqEA-0006C2-TO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:25:26 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TrqE9-0000w6-1G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:25:25 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAJBp6VACZMQS/2dsb2JhbAANOL1rgxEBAQEBAzhRCwkPCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGIH6VDj3GNbIMpA5YLgRySIQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,419,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="404609466" Received: from host-2-100-196-18.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.196.18]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2013 13:25:04 +0000 Message-ID: <50E97B2E.7090206@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:25:02 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130105-1, 05/01/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: OK Roger I shall look for you. As a reference your signal at approx. 13:00 2013-01-06 13:10 G3XBM 0.475652 -14 1 JO02dg 0.01 G3ZJO IO92ng 79 270 [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: Re: LF: Earth probe antenna tests on 472kHz WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608950e97b816fd8 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none OK Roger I shall look for you. As a reference your signal at approx. 13:00 2013-01-06 13:10 G3XBM 0.475652 -14 1 JO02dg 0.01 G3ZJO IO92ng 79 270 Seems you are not decoding me at the moment. Eddie On 06/01/2013 11:53, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > Later today I intend to transmit for several hours using my 20m spaced > earth electrode "antenna" normally used on VLF. The wire between the 2 > electrodes is at most 1.5m above ground and runs between the house and > a ground stake at the bottom of our small back garden. Signal levels > are likely to be down on those obtained with my 6m long (1/100 > wavelength) vertical, but I am interested to know by how much. > > So, if you copy my WSPR signal later today at a lower level than > usual, you know the reason. > > I expect to set up after lunch and start TXing around 1400gmt. > > WSPR reports on the earth probe antenna will be MUCH appreciated. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > -- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ > http://qss2.blogspot.com/ >