Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6DC73380000A3; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:32:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TaOcy-0007km-Dq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:30:56 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TaOcx-0007kd-Rc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:30:55 +0000 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TaOcv-0006vv-Jz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:30:54 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4BAJkJqlBcGSo//2dsb2JhbAANOIt/uFYCgg0BAQEBA0lACwQFCwQJFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBAbQbkxmMNIFmgycDlXyTMg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,278,1352073600"; d="scan'208,217";a="557210059" Received: from host-92-25-42-63.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.3]) ([92.25.42.63]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2012 10:30:52 +0000 Message-ID: <50AA0A5F.1060409@psk31.plus.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:30:55 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8BBDFD59AEC74D7AA5A2778F74FCC576@White> <50A69E13.4060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5B513DC14F8C46509C05E1AB0F769979@SV8CSHP> <6A62E7F1C7984EF193594F15235C8DF9@SV8CSHP> <50A6A7A6.7070404@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <005d01cdc440$19ae0b40$4d0a21c0$@simnet.is> <50A6B06C.2030508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50A6B51A.6010502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50A97247.4040809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <50A97247.4040809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: What I would say in support of 'Dial' and why I state 500KHz + 1400Hz (and that takes more effort to write) is for those not familiar with the mode(s). The other day I was trying to get an Old Timer CW Basher to listen to my JT9-2 across town. Dial 500 gives a good chance of him hearing something with his 'elastic VFO' RX, he asked "what frequency are yo on exactly". Give that information and that is where they want to put their 'Dial'. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 982d53dbb4bb82e9ed4f38562b2a1556 Subject: Re: LF: RXing JT9-2 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090700000901080902050807" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d605550aa0aa142ef X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090700000901080902050807 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit What I would say in support of 'Dial' and why I state 500KHz + 1400Hz (and that takes more effort to write) is for those not familiar with the mode(s). The other day I was trying to get an Old Timer CW Basher to listen to my JT9-2 across town. Dial 500 gives a good chance of him hearing something with his 'elastic VFO' RX, he asked "what frequency are yo on exactly". Give that information and that is where they want to put their 'Dial'. Eddie On 18/11/2012 23:41, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > G.., > > Am 18.11.2012 16:47, schrieb Graham: >> [...] >> better to use the dial convention , > > Dial, what is that? Where can i find such a thing here? And why do i > need it??? > > There is no dial here, and no USB. USB is HF SSB > ready-to-use-equipment-stuff. > > When i say i'm transmitting e.g. at 137.44 kHz then this means that > the center frequency of my JT9 transmission is 137.44 kHz, nothing > else. This is a very clear information. > > Dial, if you like that, you can choose what you like: Use 136.0 kHz > dial USB and you will find me at 1440 Hz. If you prefer 136.1 kHz dial > then you will find me at 1340 Hz. If you prefer 136.3 kHz dial then > you will find me at 1140 Hz. But it will always be a signal > generated/received at 137.44 kHz :-) > > 73, Stefan > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2629/5404 - Release Date: 11/18/12 > --------------090700000901080902050807 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What I would say in support of 'Dial' and why I state 500KHz + 1400Hz (and that takes more effort to write) is for those not familiar with the mode(s).
The other day I was trying to get an Old Timer CW Basher to listen to my JT9-2 across town. Dial 500 gives a good chance of him hearing something with his 'elastic VFO' RX, he asked "what frequency are yo on exactly". Give that information and that is where they want to put their 'Dial'.

Eddie

On 18/11/2012 23:41, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
G..,

Am 18.11.2012 16:47, schrieb Graham:
[...]
better to  use the  dial  convention ,

Dial, what is that? Where can i find such a thing here? And why do i need it???

There is no dial here, and no USB. USB is HF SSB ready-to-use-equipment-stuff.

When i say i'm transmitting e.g. at 137.44 kHz then this means that the center frequency of my JT9 transmission is 137.44 kHz, nothing else. This is a very clear information.

Dial, if you like that, you can choose what you like: Use 136.0 kHz dial USB and you will find me at 1440 Hz. If you prefer 136.1 kHz dial then you will find me at 1340 Hz. If you prefer 136.3 kHz dial then you will find me at 1140 Hz. But it will always be a signal generated/received at 137.44 kHz :-)

73, Stefan

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2629/5404 - Release Date: 11/18/12


--------------090700000901080902050807--