Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6EC553800009D; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:46:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TZPz5-0007sM-C3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:45:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TZPz4-0007sD-W6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:45:42 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TZPz3-00053B-GV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:45:41 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvoBAFp7plBcGSl//2dsb2JhbAANNw66bYtQZRgWGAMCAQIBSwEMCAEBsxWTXYxNhHMDlXySdT2BZA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,266,1352073600"; d="scan'208";a="410141861" Received: from host-92-25-41-127.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.3]) ([92.25.41.127]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 16 Nov 2012 17:45:40 +0000 Message-ID: <50A67BC1.2030600@psk31.plus.com> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:45:37 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, Joe Taylor X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Today I was testing WSJTX v0.4 JT9-2 into a 50ohm dummy load at 3.7Mhz (transverter drive frequency) with RX on 3.7MHz decodes failed after a time. Changing to JT9-1 with the same set up the program crashed after 1 Hour 52 minutes, sorry no clues, no entry in wsjtx text file. Using the 50ohm load on 3.7MHz eliminates the possibility of RF fields at 500KHz causing problems, although WSJTX v0.3 didn't crash ever. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: LF: WSJTX Tests / Running JT9-1 now 500khz + 1400hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d411550a67c044e56 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Today I was testing WSJTX v0.4 JT9-2 into a 50ohm dummy load at 3.7Mhz (transverter drive frequency) with RX on 3.7MHz decodes failed after a time. Changing to JT9-1 with the same set up the program crashed after 1 Hour 52 minutes, sorry no clues, no entry in wsjtx text file. Using the 50ohm load on 3.7MHz eliminates the possibility of RF fields at 500KHz causing problems, although WSJTX v0.3 didn't crash ever. Now running JT9-1 on 500KHz dial + 1400Hz E-mail reports and QSO skeds welcome. Eddie